Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need development for computing non-HST filter absolute flux calibration covariance matrix #781

Open
galaxyumi opened this issue Dec 9, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels

Comments

@galaxyumi
Copy link
Contributor

Current calculation of absolute flux calibration covariance matrix is only correct for HST filters. For non-HST filters, the BEAST still computes the covariance matrix for any given filters without complaining as long as it has flist[i].transmit information for any given filters. This is just because the current BEAST doesn’t care if a given filter is HST filter or non-HST filter. This is not accurate for non-HST filters.

@karllark karllark added the bug label May 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants