You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi!
First and foremost, I want to express my gratitude for providing such a useful tool.
I’ve been using iseq recently, and I’ve noticed a significantly higher failure rate when downloading data from ENA using the command iseq -i PRJNA273563 -p 4 -d ena -g. This failure rate seems to be much higher compared to using wget or ascp directly. Similarly, the failure rate when downloading data from SRA is also higher than when using the SRA Toolkit directly.
I’m not sure if this is just a perception on my part (perhaps due to network fluctuations during the download process), or if there’s something inherent in iseq’s mechanisms that could be causing this. Is there any way to adjust or optimize the settings to improve the success rate?
Thank you once again for your time and effort. I look forward to your response.
Best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi!
First and foremost, I want to express my gratitude for providing such a useful tool.
I’ve been using iseq recently, and I’ve noticed a significantly higher failure rate when downloading data from ENA using the command iseq -i PRJNA273563 -p 4 -d ena -g. This failure rate seems to be much higher compared to using wget or ascp directly. Similarly, the failure rate when downloading data from SRA is also higher than when using the SRA Toolkit directly.
I’m not sure if this is just a perception on my part (perhaps due to network fluctuations during the download process), or if there’s something inherent in iseq’s mechanisms that could be causing this. Is there any way to adjust or optimize the settings to improve the success rate?
Thank you once again for your time and effort. I look forward to your response.
Best regards
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: