Add support for x86-64 decompilation

[radare]

No description provided.

[hakusdream]

@nemerle Perhaps milestones would suit this better. Adding an architecture is several months in the making.

[nemerle]

Well, for now it's just a wish, since milestone would mean that we're actually going to implement it 😄

[hakusdream]

True, although I wouldn't rule out someone committing a feature branch.
On Mar 29, 2016 7:02 AM, "Artur K." notifications@github.com wrote:

Well, for now it's just a wish, since milestone would mean that we're
actually going to implement it [image: 😄]

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#49 (comment)

[hakusdream]

Note, the AMD64 Architecture's Programming Manual describes enough of the architecture to implement.

[nemerle]

The problem is not with the description of the AMD64, but with the cpu specification framework boomerang uses. It's a pretty obscure machine code parser generator using New Jersey Machine Code Toolkit.
I've pondered generating boomerang SSL compatible asm statements using Capstone but it's waaaay down the priority list