We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Right now, if the recipient sends back an incorrect proof, it would be a no-op because the callback wouldn't be found in the awaitingProof table (ref: https://github.com/CFC-Servers/gm_express/blob/main/lua/gm_express/sh_init.lua#L131-L141)
awaitingProof
We should have some way of erroring or alerting of this case at minimum, but letting the sender define an error handling function would also be nice.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
brandonsturgeon
No branches or pull requests
Right now, if the recipient sends back an incorrect proof, it would be a no-op because the callback wouldn't be found in the
awaitingProof
table (ref: https://github.com/CFC-Servers/gm_express/blob/main/lua/gm_express/sh_init.lua#L131-L141)We should have some way of erroring or alerting of this case at minimum, but letting the sender define an error handling function would also be nice.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: