You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have some dlt files, which is named as xxx.1.dlt, xxx.9.dlt, xxx.10.dlt, xxx.99.dlt, xxx.100.dlt ...
Can author modify the sourcecode to sort these files in the proper sequence of increasing numbers?
And when I select the folder to open all dlt files, these files can also be opened in this sequence.
PS: In macOS, Finder can sort these files properly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Good idea. I could add easily add a sorting of the filenames when opening, which should be normally sone by Windows Explorer but we still have issues with sorting like with DN_KRNL.12.dlt. Better naming would be DN_KRNL.012.dlt.
But this what you think should be implemented, that also DN_KRNL.12.dlt is handled correctly in the right order?
Good idea. I could add easily add a sorting of the filenames when opening, which should be normally sone by Windows Explorer but we still have issues with sorting like with DN_KRNL.12.dlt. Better naming would be DN_KRNL.012.dlt. But this what you think should be implemented, that also DN_KRNL.12.dlt is handled correctly in the right order?
Yes, I think DN_KRNL.12.dlt should treat as DN_KRNL.012.dlt while sorting. Just like 001 to 999.
I have some dlt files, which is named as xxx.1.dlt, xxx.9.dlt, xxx.10.dlt, xxx.99.dlt, xxx.100.dlt ...
Can author modify the sourcecode to sort these files in the proper sequence of increasing numbers?
And when I select the folder to open all dlt files, these files can also be opened in this sequence.
PS: In macOS, Finder can sort these files properly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: