Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove the xcheri-rvc feature once evaluation is complete #681

Open
arichardson opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Remove the xcheri-rvc feature once evaluation is complete #681

arichardson opened this issue Feb 9, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@arichardson
Copy link
Member

Having the feature adds additional complexity and it should really be gated by presence of the C extension. However, the -mno-xcheri-rvc flag is currently still useful for evaluation of code size differences.

arichardson added a commit to arichardson/llvm-project that referenced this issue Feb 9, 2023
Both hardware implementations and QEMU have supported these for a long
time, so it makes sense for the compiler to default to emitting them if
the "C" extension is enabled. This retains the flags that were used to
enable the instructions but turns them into an opt-out flag instead.
Once the exact impact of compressed CHERI instructions has been evaluated,
these command line options and the SubtargetFeature can be removed.

See CTSRD-CHERI#681
arichardson added a commit to arichardson/llvm-project that referenced this issue Feb 10, 2023
Both hardware implementations and QEMU have supported these for a long
time, so it makes sense for the compiler to default to emitting them if
the "C" extension is enabled. This retains the flags that were used to
enable the instructions but turns them into an opt-out flag instead.
Once the exact impact of compressed CHERI instructions has been evaluated,
these command line options and the SubtargetFeature can be removed.

See CTSRD-CHERI#681
arichardson added a commit to arichardson/llvm-project that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2023
Both hardware implementations and QEMU have supported these for a long
time, so it makes sense for the compiler to default to emitting them if
the "C" extension is enabled. This retains the flags that were used to
enable the instructions but turns them into an opt-out flag instead.
Once the exact impact of compressed CHERI instructions has been evaluated,
these command line options and the SubtargetFeature can be removed.

See CTSRD-CHERI#681
arichardson added a commit to arichardson/llvm-project that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2023
Both hardware implementations and QEMU have supported these for a long
time, so it makes sense for the compiler to default to emitting them if
the "C" extension is enabled. This retains the flags that were used to
enable the instructions but turns them into an opt-out flag instead.
Once the exact impact of compressed CHERI instructions has been evaluated,
these command line options and the SubtargetFeature can be removed.

See CTSRD-CHERI#681
arichardson added a commit to arichardson/llvm-project that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2023
Both hardware implementations and QEMU have supported these for a long
time, so it makes sense for the compiler to default to emitting them if
the "C" extension is enabled. This retains the flags that were used to
enable the instructions but turns them into an opt-out flag instead.
Once the exact impact of compressed CHERI instructions has been evaluated,
these command line options and the SubtargetFeature can be removed.

See CTSRD-CHERI#681
arichardson added a commit that referenced this issue Feb 17, 2023
Both hardware implementations and QEMU have supported these for a long
time, so it makes sense for the compiler to default to emitting them if
the "C" extension is enabled. This retains the flags that were used to
enable the instructions but turns them into an opt-out flag instead.
Once the exact impact of compressed CHERI instructions has been evaluated,
these command line options and the SubtargetFeature can be removed.

See #681
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants