Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fork-and-pull or branching method of contributing? #1

Open
lindsayplatt opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Fork-and-pull or branching method of contributing? #1

lindsayplatt opened this issue May 21, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@lindsayplatt
Copy link
Collaborator

Both are methods that allow collaborative coding but just different ways to go about it with their own positives/negatives. Positive of fork-and-pull (which is how the course is setup now) is that the main repo is more protected from accidental changes AND is how a lot of open science happens. Negative is that it can be more confusing because there are more copies of the repo floating around and folks have to make PRs starting from their fork.

Both have their merits but we should talk about which we want to teach. USGS is switching to branching, so if we end up sharing a training repo, we may need to have different options/versions.

@lindsayplatt lindsayplatt added the question Further information is requested label May 21, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant