Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jury references #72

Open
loleg opened this issue Aug 23, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Jury references #72

loleg opened this issue Aug 23, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@loleg
Copy link
Member

loleg commented Aug 23, 2021

For extra clarity on the objectivity of the evaluators, I think it would be great if the jury could (individually or as a group) write a small (Twitter-format or LinkedIn-reference style) comment for every awarded project which mentions any specific indicators leading to their decision. See also #71

@mirodietiker
Copy link

Moving over my text from #73
We have identified that expert jury is sometimes involved in projects in their category.
Due to the interest of Jury in both open and topic and the limited size of local communities and networks, this can easily happen.

We should put a statement about how we handle this biased situation to avoid bias in the choice.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants