Should the second "if" keyword in adapt_bbox from layout_utils.py rather be an "elif" keyword ?

[Raphilanthrope]

Question

I think I identified a typo based on a comment and the logic of the code itself.

In "adapt_bbox" from "layout_utils.py", there are three lines at the first function indentation level:
if not (cluster["type"] in [DocItemLabel.TABLE, DocItemLabel.PICTURE]):;
if cluster["type"] == DocItemLabel.PICTURE: and
else: ## A table

Based on the comment ## A table and the fact that there is to my understanding other classes that TABLE and PICTURES leading to a re-definition of new_bbox in the else statement when handling a cluster's class different from a table and a picture, I think the second if is meant to be an elif keyword., i.e. we would write:
elif cluster["type"] == DocItemLabel.PICTURE:

Am I right ?

Thank you for this great tool by the way :)

[PeterStaar-IBM]

@Raphilanthrope Make a quick PR with the fix, this could indeed be a bug.

[cau-git]

@Raphilanthrope This is obsolete since docling 2.13.0 because the layout_utils code is entirely replaced.