Replies: 2 comments
-
Not sure if this discussion is still open, but will give a few extra requests:
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
One more: the link with water quality! If would be great if a simple tracer could be added to wflow. In the past, there have also been discussions to make it possible to couple DelWaq online. Something similar was done for Delft3D FM, which for water quality was a huge improvement in many cases. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Crucial features and enhancements for wflow v1.0
network
,vertical
andlateral
fields of theModel
struct are stored asNamedTuples
. It would be better to store these variables asStructs
, this also requires an explicit description of the content. How to best structure this into theModel
struct also depends on the decoupling of vertical and horizontal concepts and reorganization of long structs (see below).SBM
,FLEXTOPO
andHBV
. These are related to the components interception, snow and glacier. While functionality is shared at the low level (vertical_process.jl), this functionality can also be shared at the sub struct level. We could also consider to pull these components out of the vertical struct, e.g.model.glacier.
etc.initialize_*_model
functions, that can be separated into multiple sub functions.kinwave_it
(boolean for the use of iterations as part of the kinematic wave) andΔt
.SBM
iterations are implemented for the unsaturated flow).SBM
concept. It would be good to decide (and discuss) whether we want to support theHBV
andFLEXTOPO
concepts in v1.0.Additional features and enhancements for wflow 1.0
These features and enhancements are not critical for v1.0, but would significantly enhance the overall user experience.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions