Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
I'm puzzled as to why you can't pass Linopy variable and constraint labels as column and row names and think that you need a custom interface The only option that you might try is run_crossover=off since I recall that you don't need a basic solution. At the moment the documentation is WIP, so is not editable. Once it's complete, edits could be suggested by checking out a branch of HiGHS Sorry not to reply sooner, but I've only just switched on notifications for discussions |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi HiGHS team, @fneum was playing a little bit around with HiGHS and created a benchmark that is updating every 5 days, is automatically looking for the newest HiGHS version (now 1.5.0dev0, 27.02.23) and is comparing it performance with the 1.1.2.dev3 version. The benchmark is hosted on a GitHub pages (prototype), with the code being available on GitHub here. One goal is to extend this benchmark and test various energy system modelling specific problems with HiGHS and potentially compare them to other open-source alternatives e.g. cbc, glpk, scip.
The benchmark is currently using the Python Linopy interface for HiGHS (thanks to dev. @FabianHofmann) that can:
For the benchmark, we currently use the HiGHS default options.. Let us know if we should pass any other option that we could add here.
HiGHS/src/lp_data/HighsOptions.h
Lines 252 to 265 in ce35101
Thanks for all the fascinating work! 🥇
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions