You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
At the November 2024 workshop the topic of expansion of the resume_from function came up.
Here are my propositions:
Make the requirement of the recipes being absolutely identical looser. For example, allow resuming if few keywords in diagnostic changed. Ideally, addition of a new diagnostic and/or of variable group would be allowed to restart from.
If the procession of the variable group didn't finish, still use the processed files. There were a few instances when a part of the variable group got processed, but the whole group had to restart, even though let's say 169 out of 170 files got successfully processed.
Happy to elaborate, other suggestions welcome, I know @k-a-webb had some suggestions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
My use case mainly concerns model benchmarking, where I am re-running the same recipe except an edit to the datasets list.
A very convenient feature of the current resume_from tool is that it uses the already preprocessed data.
Currently, resumable recipes need be exactly (or nearly exactly) the same as run previously -- which excludes editing the datasets list.
I would propose relaxing the requirement of having an identical dataset list, which is to say I support @malininae 's proposals!
At the November 2024 workshop the topic of expansion of the
resume_from
function came up.Here are my propositions:
Happy to elaborate, other suggestions welcome, I know @k-a-webb had some suggestions.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: