You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
While researching support for -epub-ruby-position, I found it interesting that some reading systems fail the Ruby tests, but pass style-410. And some reading systems pass the Ruby tests, but fail style-410. Given that style-410 is just the initial value of ruby-position, this is weird. As written, I don't think style-410 gives us much information about the level of support for ruby-position. Perhaps these style tests should be moved into the test file that checks for ruby support itself...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
While researching support for
-epub-ruby-position
, I found it interesting that some reading systems fail the Ruby tests, but pass style-410. And some reading systems pass the Ruby tests, but fail style-410. Given that style-410 is just the initial value ofruby-position
, this is weird. As written, I don't think style-410 gives us much information about the level of support forruby-position
. Perhaps these style tests should be moved into the test file that checks for ruby support itself...The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: