Replies: 1 comment 3 replies
-
I believe the idea there was that while you may completely remove content items (#6056) or other data, the Audit Trail should remain an immutable store of changes. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I was just creating custom audit trail extension, when I noticed that AuditTrail currently duplicitly stores Documents in json format. As I look at the code I do not see a problem to take version data of content items straight from Document table. I suppose it may be better to deduplicate this data, what do you think?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions