Typescript Rewrite #2964
adambrangenberg
started this conversation in
Ideas
Replies: 3 comments 6 replies
-
Hi,
Typescript has a high entry cost (compilation making everything slower and
making usage of dependencies harder) and low benefits.
If you manage to make the code much higher quality by rewriting a
significant package to it, it might be convincing.
Otherwise we're staying in JavaScript.
…On Sun, Mar 5, 2023, 02:45 Adam Brangenberg ***@***.***> wrote:
Hey, I opened this discussion because:
1. I'm not sure in what order to rewrite things to get the types of
the basis while creating ones for higher packages?
2. If the project even wants to use Typescript?
The benefits of using Typescript would be a higher code quality because
with static typing many bugs are being catched while developing and easier
development because of improved editor support and documentation.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#2964>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAR437SC5FVWZ3GMSXJYXADW2PV37ANCNFSM6AAAAAAVP3YB6Q>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
-
If we rewrite it we should use ESM import/export |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
@rom1504 Create an branch name |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
3 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hey, I opened this discussion because:
The benefits of using Typescript would be a higher code quality because with static typing many bugs are being catched while developing and easier development because of improved editor support and documentation.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions