Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Radioactive decay is incorrectly inferred as a planned process #220

Open
DanBerrios opened this issue Jul 26, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Radioactive decay is incorrectly inferred as a planned process #220

DanBerrios opened this issue Jul 26, 2024 · 2 comments
Assignees
@DanBerrios
Labels
implemented: confirmed & ready for release

Comments

@DanBerrios
Copy link
Collaborator

Pointed out by Mark Philips.

This is because we used "OBI:has specified input some atomic nucleus" axiom on this class. Has specified input, as defined by OBI, has domains both process and planned process and the interpretation of multiple domains by OWL is the intersection of both classes. Hence, domain on this relation must be both process and planned process.

We can switch to "RO:has input".
DanBerrios added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 26, 2024
@DanBerrios
Partial fix for #220 Radioactive Decay as Planned Process
2deff2c
@DanBerrios DanBerrios self-assigned this Aug 15, 2024
@DanBerrios
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Reviewed bug fix for this on 08/15/24. Approved by @jmskip and @kristenpeach and @DanBerrios

@DanBerrios
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Need to look at relationship with atomic nucleus and RO imported relation "existence ends with".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@DanBerrios DanBerrios

Labels
implemented: confirmed & ready for release
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@DanBerrios