You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Di Cocco, Jessica, and Bernardo Monechi. "How populist are parties? Measuring degrees of populism in party manifestos using supervised machine learning." Political Analysis 30.3 (2022): 311-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/pan.2021.29
How Populist are Parties? Measuring Degrees of Populism in Party Manifestos Using Supervised Machine Learning
One of the main challenges in comparative studies on populism concerns its temporal and spatial measurements within and between a large number of parties and countries. Textual analysis has proved useful for these purposes, and automated methods can further improve research in this direction. Here, we propose a method to derive a score of parties’ levels of populism using supervised machine learning to perform textual analysis on national manifestos. We illustrate the advantages of our approach, which allows for measuring populism for a vast number of parties and countries without resource-intensive human-coding processes and provides accurate, updated information for temporal and spatial comparisons of populism. Furthermore, our method allows for obtaining a continuous score of populism, which ensures more fine-grained analyses of the party landscape while reducing the risk of arbitrary classifications. To illustrate the potential contribution of this score, we use it as a proxy for parties’ levels of populism, analyzing average trends in six European countries from the early 2000s for nearly two decades.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
-
How Populist are Parties? Measuring Degrees of Populism in Party Manifestos Using Supervised Machine Learning
如何衡量西方政党的民粹程度?一个监督机器学习方法 | Political Analysis
汪浩東 PoIiticaI理论志
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/BdPHheUEv5DOufXgp7162w
编者荐语:
这篇研究展示了机器学习在衡量西方民粹主义程度上的潜力。本文通过使用基于监督机器学习的文本即数据方法,提出了一种衡量政党民粹主义水平的系统方法,作者通过对欧洲六国近 20 年268 个政党的选举宣言中提取的 243659 条句子进行了文本分析,揭示了民粹主义在各国的演变趋势。实验结果表明,各国民粹主义程度间存在显着差异。民粹主义在意大利急剧上升,而在其他国家则呈现出不均衡的趋势。这篇文章介绍的方法对民粹主义方法论提供了重要的启发,该方法还可以应用于检查更大的时间间隔、其他类型的文本来源或其他类型的政治和社会现象的演变与发展。
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 October 2021
Jessica Di Cocco and Bernardo Monechi
Abstract
One of the main challenges in comparative studies on populism concerns its temporal and spatial measurements within and between a large number of parties and countries. Textual analysis has proved useful for these purposes, and automated methods can further improve research in this direction. Here, we propose a method to derive a score of parties’ levels of populism using supervised machine learning to perform textual analysis on national manifestos. We illustrate the advantages of our approach, which allows for measuring populism for a vast number of parties and countries without resource-intensive human-coding processes and provides accurate, updated information for temporal and spatial comparisons of populism. Furthermore, our method allows for obtaining a continuous score of populism, which ensures more fine-grained analyses of the party landscape while reducing the risk of arbitrary classifications. To illustrate the potential contribution of this score, we use it as a proxy for parties’ levels of populism, analyzing average trends in six European countries from the early 2000s for nearly two decades.
Replication code
for this article is available at https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/BMJYAN (Di Cocco and Monechi Reference Di Cocco and Monechi2021).
or you can access the scripts and data from github
https://github.com/bernomone/howPopParties_addendum
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions