You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I recently stumbled upon a 2018 ICA spike sorting paper by @alejoe91 and others, and was wondering: is there any reason why ICA options are not part of SpikeInterface?
Could one deduce that spike sorting is a domain adapted form of ICA which uses the notion of templates and domain-specific constraints and quality metrics to its advantage, where ICA is more generically concerned with untangling signals from multiple sources (such as audio signals, which don't have such constraints like inter spike intervals)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I recently stumbled upon a 2018 ICA spike sorting paper by @alejoe91 and others, and was wondering: is there any reason why ICA options are not part of SpikeInterface?
Could one deduce that spike sorting is a domain adapted form of ICA which uses the notion of templates and domain-specific constraints and quality metrics to its advantage, where ICA is more generically concerned with untangling signals from multiple sources (such as audio signals, which don't have such constraints like inter spike intervals)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: