Replies: 3 comments
-
Hi @MaeBee, Thank you for the suggestion! You can already achieve this--at least with whole numbers--by way of
Admittedly, the syntax isn't as elegant as your proposed Support for decimal numbers would be an interesting challenge, I'll have to think about the best way of implementing that. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello again, I just released a new update with a couple benefits for weighted Specifically, you can now use In terms of probability, I think this works out to a different chance than calculating the sum of all choices upfront (which is maybe what you had in mind) but regardless, this solution is fairly intuitive for the end user and gives you finegrained control over your choice blocks. Additionally, you can now pass a
Finally, I've decided to add this to |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Oh, I hadn't even thought about using |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Having the ability to add weight to individual options of a
[choice]
would be handy.A simple implementation would be to duplicate the entries, but more robust solutions might allow the use of decimals.
I'd propose a
[weight x]
shortcode in front of the option to be weighed, as such:Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions