Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GSEA to discover mixed enriched terms #84

Open
mauritsunkel opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

GSEA to discover mixed enriched terms #84

mauritsunkel opened this issue May 16, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@mauritsunkel
Copy link

Hi,

Now, enriched terms are either up- or down regulated, likely because of the weighting in the running sum implementation. However, there must be terms with mixed enrichment, where some type of mixed activation/inhibition actually leads to very enriched terms, which is now missed through the implementation. I realise this is more in the domain of topology based algorithms, applied to terms which represent pathways, however, I'm hopeful we could get some additional information out of just the ranked expression list.

In order to find mixed enriched terms, I'm curious if it would be proper, and statistically viable, to make the expression values absolute before running GSEA?
Or would additional transformations like scaling/normalization be needed additionally?

Best,
Maus

@guidohooiveld
Copy link

guidohooiveld commented May 28, 2024

For the archive: this issue has been cross-posted/discussed at the GitHub of fgsea: ctlab/fgsea#154

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants