You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The code itself looks very nice and consistent. However, Looking over the code base it looks like we're not using idiomatic typescript. There are no type declarations, we are using string accessors instead of dot notation etc etc. Is there a design theory behind this or are we open to enhancements?
Defining the types that are flowing through the system would make understanding the codebase much easier to document and understand.
Description
The code itself looks very nice and consistent. However, Looking over the code base it looks like we're not using idiomatic typescript. There are no type declarations, we are using string accessors instead of dot notation etc etc. Is there a design theory behind this or are we open to enhancements?
Defining the types that are flowing through the system would make understanding the codebase much easier to document and understand.
Happy to help
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: