You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
IsNonAssociativeRing admits enough properties to make the zero field redundant by exactly the same argument as for IsRingWithoutOne (so the redundancy is a bug, and removing it would be breaking)
correspondingly, the argument for IsRingWithoutOne makes no use of *-assoc...
Possible remedy: introduce a further refinement in which a new IsNonAssociativeRingWithoutOne would the 'right' home for such an argument, with each of the above two structures inheriting from that...?
Cf. #2195 and #2253
IsNonAssociativeRing
admits enough properties to make thezero
field redundant by exactly the same argument as forIsRingWithoutOne
(so the redundancy is abug
, and removing it would bebreaking
)IsRingWithoutOne
makes no use of*-assoc
...Possible remedy: introduce a further refinement in which a new
IsNonAssociativeRingWithoutOne
would the 'right' home for such an argument, with each of the above two structures inheriting from that...?See for example this blob and prior refactoring via
Quasiring...
for a possible solution.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: