why is 401 mapped to unauthenticated instead of unauthorized?

[daniel-portillo]

Hi all, just a qq around this mapping here: https://github.com/apollographql/datasource-rest/blob/main/src/RESTDataSource.ts#L377

This is one of those things that I've always felt makes more sense to be UNAUTHENTICATED but sadly isn't so.
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9110.html#name-401-unauthorized

This mapping mentioned above tripped me up a bit because it seems to go against the spec and the expectation from the client is usually for this code to be UNAUTHORIZED just for historical reasons.

Wanted to see how others felt about this and whether it might be something that could be changed. Thanks!