Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Understand Temoa's results #155

Closed
robfairh opened this issue Feb 17, 2021 · 6 comments
Closed

Understand Temoa's results #155

robfairh opened this issue Feb 17, 2021 · 6 comments
Assignees
Labels
Comp:Input This issue has to do with the input component of the code or document. (input parameters, prep) Difficulty:2-Challenging This issue may be complex or require specialized skills. Priority:1-Critical This is the highest priority (i.e. it is blocking other work or facing a deadline). Status:4-In Progress This is actively being worked on by the assignee. Type:Bug Something is wrong or broken. This issue or PR is related to a bug in code. Type:Question This issue can be closed with a discussion and/or an answer.

Comments

@robfairh
Copy link
Contributor

Here are some the results for Temoa's current models:

UIUC_2050_cost:

Figure 1:
cost scenario_all_emissions_co2eq

Figure 2:
cost scenario_ind_generation

Figure 3:
cost scenario_elc_generation

Figure 4:
cost scenario_ind_capacity

  • Issue number 1:
    Figure 1 shows that the CO2 emission falls to zero.
    Figure 2 is consistent with this behavior.
    However, Figure 3 is not. TURBINE produces electricity somehow without producing CO2. If TURBINE produces electricity means that ABBOTT is producing STM. However, Figure 2 shows that ABBOTT doesn't produce STM. The only explanation I find is that Temoa is accumulating STM```.

  • Issue number 2:
    Figure 4 shows that ABBOTT's capacity is more than 375 MWth in 2021. The model imposes that constraint for all the future years including 2021. The rest of the years seem to meet this constraint.

UIUC_2050_land:

Figure 1:
land scenario_all_emissions_co2eq

Figure 2:
land scenario_ind_generation

Figure 3:
land scenario_elc_generation

  • Issue number 3: similar to number 1 but for the land-use model.

This issue can be closed when an explanation for these phenomena is found and the 3 issues are fixed.

@robfairh robfairh added Comp:Input This issue has to do with the input component of the code or document. (input parameters, prep) Difficulty:2-Challenging This issue may be complex or require specialized skills. Priority:1-Critical This is the highest priority (i.e. it is blocking other work or facing a deadline). Status:1-New No one has claimed this issue yet. It is in need of solving. Type:Bug Something is wrong or broken. This issue or PR is related to a bug in code. Type:Question This issue can be closed with a discussion and/or an answer. labels Feb 17, 2021
@robfairh robfairh mentioned this issue Feb 17, 2021
@yardasol
Copy link
Contributor

hmm this one's a doozy

@samgdotson
Copy link
Collaborator

This isn't so bad.

  1. We should get rid of the minimum activity for wind after 2026. That's when the university's actual PPA ends.
  2. I'm actually not bothered by the fact that the cost scenario adds so much wind power. This just means that Temoa believes it is in the University's interest to obtain more PPAs. The results would likely be different if UIUC had to pay a fixed cost for wind and solar energy. Bottom line, this is okay.
  3. To solve the TURBINE issue. Try adding a small but non-zero amount of carbon emissions from the Turbine. Perhaps 0.00001 tons/GWh (whatever the units are, I'm forgetting). This should force Temoa to stop using the TURBINE to generate electricity.

@samgdotson
Copy link
Collaborator

Update: @robfairh and I solved the TURBINE problem. data_parser was combining TURBINE and NTURBINE. We have renamed NTURBINE "SPINNY" for the moment, to prevent string overlap. Here is the new result:
costScenario_elc_generation

@yardasol
Copy link
Contributor

@samgdotson Can you PR your fixes?

@robfairh
Copy link
Contributor Author

robfairh commented Feb 25, 2021

  • Issue number 1:
    Figure 1 shows that the CO2 emission falls to zero.
    Figure 2 is consistent with this behavior.
    However, Figure 3 is not. TURBINE produces electricity somehow without producing CO2. If TURBINE produces electricity means that ABBOTT is producing STM. However, Figure 2 shows that ABBOTT doesn't produce STM. The only explanation I find is that Temoa is accumulating STM.

PR #156 partially fixes this issue, by solving the above-called issue number 1.

@robfairh robfairh added Status:4-In Progress This is actively being worked on by the assignee. and removed Status:1-New No one has claimed this issue yet. It is in need of solving. labels Feb 25, 2021
@robfairh robfairh changed the title Review assumptions and understand Temoa's results Understand Temoa's results Feb 25, 2021
@robfairh
Copy link
Contributor Author

  • Issue number 2:
    Figure 4 shows that ABBOTT's capacity is more than 375 MWth in 2021. The model imposes that constraint for all the future years including 2021. The rest of the years seem to meet this constraint.

This issue number 2 is addressed in a new issue: #162.
Closing this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Comp:Input This issue has to do with the input component of the code or document. (input parameters, prep) Difficulty:2-Challenging This issue may be complex or require specialized skills. Priority:1-Critical This is the highest priority (i.e. it is blocking other work or facing a deadline). Status:4-In Progress This is actively being worked on by the assignee. Type:Bug Something is wrong or broken. This issue or PR is related to a bug in code. Type:Question This issue can be closed with a discussion and/or an answer.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants