Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Screen option ignored in custom matcher (awesome 3.5) #20

Open
mpaulucci opened this issue Apr 24, 2013 · 4 comments
Open

Screen option ignored in custom matcher (awesome 3.5) #20

mpaulucci opened this issue Apr 24, 2013 · 4 comments

Comments

@mpaulucci
Copy link

Hello, I'm using the shifty branch 3.5, and my version of awesome is 3.5.1.

I have two screens, and I'm trying to make a custom matcher, that looks like this:

{
    match = {
        "skype",
    },
    tag = "4:chat",
    screen = 2,
},

When I open skype on screen 2, it works ok (opens in "4:chat" tag), but when I open it on screen 1, a new tag is created (named "4:chat") and skype is opened there. It seems to be ignoring the screen=2 option.

Is this feature not implemented yet or is this a bug (or maybe I'm doing it wrong)?

Thanks!

@alfredopalhares
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello, you should be aware that shifty is deprecated. https://github.com/Elv13/tyrannical is it "sucessor" where the standard awful library can not meet the dinamic tagging.

@gdott9
Copy link
Contributor

gdott9 commented Apr 24, 2013

Hello,

Well, thanks for the info. I'll have to try this project.
It may be a good idea to mention that in the readme of this repo.

@mpaulucci
Copy link
Author

Thanks! Already using it, looks really good so far!

@socek
Copy link

socek commented May 12, 2013

Tyrannical is not a good replacment for shifty. Do anyone know any other
alternatives?

2013/4/25 Martin Paulucci notifications@github.com

Thanks! Already using it, looks really good so far!


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/20#issuecomment-16985289
.

Pozdrawiam
Dominik "Socek" Długajczyk

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants