You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've noticed when addressing IntersectMBO/cardano-cli#906 that, while the schema identifies the hash algorithm here as "CIP-0008" (consistently with the CIP-0108 text), in this example, it is written in lowercase ("cip-0008"). We probably should make this consistent. And I imagine we should favour "CIP-0008". Alternatively, if we want to allow both representations, we may want to update the schema to reflect that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
thanks @palas - I agree that CIP-0008 (all uppercase) is canonical and that this would be desirable to fix... but we should poll my co-editors @Ryun1@perturbing@Crypto2099 in case there could be technical problems adjusting the schema.
In the meantime you are welcome to submit a pull request that changes this in the repository: and we would appreciate the help because otherwise this will likely remain as a TODO item for the editors.
palas
added a commit
to palas/CIPs
that referenced
this issue
Dec 16, 2024
I've noticed when addressing IntersectMBO/cardano-cli#906 that, while the schema identifies the hash algorithm here as "CIP-0008" (consistently with the CIP-0108 text), in this example, it is written in lowercase ("cip-0008"). We probably should make this consistent. And I imagine we should favour "CIP-0008". Alternatively, if we want to allow both representations, we may want to update the schema to reflect that.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: