CMake 3.1 appears to be sufficient

[tclune]

Does not look like there is a mac port for 3.2, so the min requirement is in the way of usage

[citibeth]

Tom,

I'm using cmake 3.2 on MacPorts.

Have you tried setting the first line of the top-level CMakeLists.txt to:

cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.1)

At this point, I haven't gone to any effort to determine the minimum
version of CMake required. My off-the-cuff guess is anything in the 3
series should be OK. Would be interested in hearing back from experience.

-- Bob

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:07 PM, tclune notifications@github.com wrote:

Does not look like there is a mac port for 3.2, so the min requirement is
in the way of usage

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#4.

[tclune]

On May 11, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Bob Fischer notifications@github.com wrote:

Tom,

I'm using cmake 3.2 on MacPorts.

Have you tried setting the first line of the top-level CMakeLists.txt to:

cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.1)

Yes. And that works. Just thought I’d mention it so that you can enlarge the user base.

At this point, I haven't gone to any effort to determine the minimum
version of CMake required. My off-the-cuff guess is anything in the 3
series should be OK. Would be interested in hearing back from experience.

I have nothing specific. Something did force me to upgrade about 1 month ago, but until then, 2.10 had been fine for a long time. I just know the default on Discover is inadequate for almost anything.

Cheers,

• Tom

-- Bob

On Mon, May 11, 2015 at 4:07 PM, tclune notifications@github.com wrote:

Does not look like there is a mac port for 3.2, so the min requirement is
in the way of usage

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#4.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub.

Thomas Clune, Ph. D. Thomas.L.Clune@nasa.gov
Head ASTG,Code 606
NASA GSFC
MS 610.8 B33-C128
Greenbelt, MD 20771
301-286-4635