diff --git a/docs/layers/eks/design-decisions/decide-on-default-storage-class.mdx b/docs/layers/eks/design-decisions/decide-on-default-storage-class.mdx
index fa8c55acb..6458de107 100644
--- a/docs/layers/eks/design-decisions/decide-on-default-storage-class.mdx
+++ b/docs/layers/eks/design-decisions/decide-on-default-storage-class.mdx
@@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ We need to decide between **Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)** and **Amazon EBS
 - **Managed Service:** Fully managed by AWS, reducing operational overhead for maintenance and scaling.
 
 ### Cons:
-- **Performance:** Generally offers lower performance compared to EBS, with throughput as low as 100 MB/s, which may not meet the demands of even modestly demanding applications.
-- **Cost:** Significantly more expensive than EBS, at least 3x the price per GB and potentially more depending on performance demands, although there may be some savings from not having to reserve size for future growth.
-- **Latency:** Higher latency compared to EBS, which may impact performance-sensitive applications.
+- **Lower Performance:** Generally offers lower performance compared to EBS, with throughput as low as 100 MB/s, which may not meet the demands of even modestly demanding applications.
+- **Higher Cost:** Significantly more expensive than EBS, at least 3x the price per GB and potentially more depending on performance demands, although there may be some savings from not having to reserve size for future growth.
+- **Higher Latency:** Higher latency compared to EBS, which may impact performance-sensitive applications.
 
 ## Amazon EBS