Explore slimming down the Solr document returned

[Baroquem]

Frances Webb added a comment - 15/Jun/16 3:40 PM
If it would help to load a smaller block of data for the item record into Solr, the Solr document itself might be smaller. The size of the data may be part of the problem for cases where thousands of items are involved. If we can define which item record fields we need, I'm sure we could trim it down considerably. Here is what's included for each item in Solr now. If this seems like a good idea, maybe a subtask for the Solr change would be a good idea?

{"sensitize":"Y",
"spine_label":"",
"magnetic_media":"N",
"recalls_placed":"0",
"temp_location":"0",
"item_barcode":"31924019544430",
"historical_browses":"0",
"item_enum":"",
"item_sequence_number":"1",
"historical_charges":"9",
"create_date":"2000-05-31 00:00:00.0",
"copy_number":"1",
"create_location_id":"0",
"mfhd_id":"2264058",
"short_loan_charges":"0",
"chron":"",
"reserve_charges":"0",
"year":"",
"modify_location_id":"0",
"media_type_id":"0",
"create_operator_id":"",
"historical_bookings":"0",
"holds_placed":"0",
"perm_location":{"code":"was","number":139,"name":"Kroch Library Asia","library":"Kroch Library Asia"},
"modify_date":"",
"temp_item_type_id":"0",
"caption":"",
"on_reserve":"N",
"pieces":"1",
"item_type_id":"3",
"price":"0",
"item_type_name":"book",
"item_id":"3519401",
"freetext":"",
"modify_operator_id":""}