Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review AD permits for requests #54

Open
Baroquem opened this issue Jun 30, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Review AD permits for requests #54

Baroquem opened this issue Jun 30, 2016 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@Baroquem
Copy link
Contributor

(Copy of https://issues.library.cornell.edu/browse/DISCOVERYACCESS-2693)

There's a question as to what the permit rules should be for treating users as Cornell affiliates vs. guests for delivery purposes. The ones we're using should be confirmed with someone (maybe Joanne?).

@Baroquem Baroquem modified the milestone: July 2016 sprint Jun 30, 2016
@Baroquem Baroquem self-assigned this Jul 12, 2016
@Baroquem
Copy link
Contributor Author

Asked Joanne about this on 7/18

@Baroquem
Copy link
Contributor Author

Baroquem commented Jul 22, 2016

Additional info from Joanne:


(see attachment)

Joanne,

Thanks — but which of these groups should be considered “cornell” and which “non-cornell” for delivery purposes?

— Matt


Matt,
I will have to ask Michelle Hubbell about this. I really am not 100% sure. Also, it looks like there are many other categories (not listed here) that exist, for which we haven’t made unique stat codes. I assume the unspecified groups get an “Affiliate – Other” code when they arise. Am I correct in thinking that the “non-Cornell” group would not qualify for BD or ILL, but get LTL?

  • Joanne

Joanne,

That’s right — non-cornell gets L2L, hold, and doc del, but no BD or ILL.

I was just looking at another old issue concerning the “CU Partner” group with unique privileges. It’s beginning to sound like we might have to significantly expand how we’re handling patron categories. What do you think?

— Matt


Matt,
It probably does need to be re-done, but the differences are fairly subtle, like with the CU Partners. For example, CU Partners are very similar to the Library Card patron group, but they don’t have a checkout limit; but they DO have an item type restriction (can only check out “book” item types)! This has more to do with emulating what Borrow Direct allows than with what we would want to allow. In fact, now that BD has expanded to allow visual item types, maybe we have to update the matrix for CU Partners. Anyway, I still have to get back to you about the Cornell/non-Cornell profile for each of the groups below. Sorry this is taking a while – too many things intervening.

  • Joanne

Patron groups for requests2.pdf

@Baroquem Baroquem removed this from the July 2016 sprint milestone Jul 22, 2016
@Baroquem Baroquem added this to the March 2017 sprint milestone Mar 20, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant