Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No taxonomy data or raw Phymm output #3

Open
gputzel opened this issue Jun 30, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

No taxonomy data or raw Phymm output #3

gputzel opened this issue Jun 30, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@gputzel
Copy link

gputzel commented Jun 30, 2017

I installed the latest version (cloned the repo 6/30/17) and tried to run the sample. I get this:


>scripts/glimmer-mg.py sample-run/glimmer-mg/seqs.fa

Scanning query lengths...done.  [Fri Jun 30 13:29:09 EDT 2017]

Reading IMM list...done.  [Fri Jun 30 13:29:09 EDT 2017]

Creating reverse complement of seqs_66694.fa...done.  [Fri Jun 30 13:29:10 EDT 2017]

Loading taxonomy...Can't open .taxonomyData/.0_accessionMap/accessionMap.txt for reading.
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/home/greg/programs/glimmer-mg/scripts/phymm_par.py", line 507, in <module>
    main()
  File "/home/greg/programs/glimmer-mg/scripts/phymm_par.py", line 61, in main
    combine_imm(seqsf, pids, origdir)
  File "/home/greg/programs/glimmer-mg/scripts/phymm_par.py", line 425, in combine_imm
    raw_files.append(open('rawPhymmOutput_seqs_%d_fa.txt' % pid))
IOError: [Errno 2] No such file or directory: 'rawPhymmOutput_seqs_66694_fa.txt'
Cannot find raw Phymm output file rawPhymmOutput_seqs_fa.txt

I am running this on Ubuntu 16

@marcomarconi
Copy link

same error here

@davek44
Copy link
Owner

davek44 commented Jun 5, 2018

You could try installing Phymm with my substitute script here: https://github.com/davek44/Glimmer-MG/blob/master/phymm_patch/0_getNCBIpages.pl

More broadly, this software never really took off. Soon after writing it, I changed fields, so it never received the nurturing it would've needed to flourish. At this point, I'd be surprised if it were the best tool available.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants