Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Help more people find the running CI jobs using bitbucket topic #4105

Closed
1 task
runleonarun opened this issue Sep 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Closed
1 task

Help more people find the running CI jobs using bitbucket topic #4105

runleonarun opened this issue Sep 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear priority: medium Fix or enhancement to existing information that’s creating some requests from customers size: x-small This change will take under 3 hours to fix.

Comments

@runleonarun
Copy link
Collaborator

runleonarun commented Sep 21, 2023 •
edited
Loading

Contributions

  • I have read the contribution docs, and understand what's expected of me.

Link to the page on docs.getdbt.com requiring updates

https://docs.getdbt.com/guides/orchestration/custom-cicd-pipelines/4-dbt-cloud-job-on-pr

What part(s) of the page would you like to see updated?

  • Request: update the Algolia weight about running CI jobs when using bitbucket?

The current issue is that searching for “bitbucket pr” or “bitbucket ci” returns many links from a Dev Blog article about dbt-core (screenshot 1), which is not relevant for dbt Cloud users, and we have to scroll all the way down to get the info for dbt Cloud (screenshot 2)

Here's the conversation about weighting search terms.

Open questions

  • We need to be careful about "weighting" topics because it could lead to a tangled mess
  • Should we add bitbucket to the title?
  • Do we need the one tab for Bitbucket? Is the tab not beign searched because it's not a "real" heading?

Additional information

No response
@runleonarun runleonarun added content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear priority: high Technical inaccuracy, missing/incorrect information, or broken links. Negatively affects workflows priority: medium Fix or enhancement to existing information that’s creating some requests from customers size: x-small This change will take under 3 hours to fix. and removed priority: high Technical inaccuracy, missing/incorrect information, or broken links. Negatively affects workflows labels Sep 21, 2023
@mirnawong1
Copy link
Contributor

resolved #5994

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
content Improvements or additions to content improvement Use this when an area of the docs needs improvement as it's currently unclear priority: medium Fix or enhancement to existing information that’s creating some requests from customers size: x-small This change will take under 3 hours to fix.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@runleonarun @mirnawong1