We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For the range of KernelSHAP method parameters defined in issue #174
Use a notebook (?) to compare pairs of 'neighboring' test images (as created in issue dianna-ai/dianna#470) and their KernelSHAP relevance maps .
Evaluate and display the p(average/mean/max/median?) relevancy vs the shape parameter scale for:
Circles. The 'neighbouring' images are defined as ones with close shape parameters (one variable, 2- fixed):
size and
gray-scale contrast
Triangles. The 'neighbouring' images are defined as ones with close shape parameters (one variable, 2- fixed):
size
rotation angle and
Stems from dianna-ai/dianna#446 and #187.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Blocked by dianna-ai/dianna#470, #174 and the creation of research template notebook similar to the text case (dianna-ai/dianna#456).
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
For the range of KernelSHAP method parameters defined in issue #174
Use a notebook (?) to compare pairs of 'neighboring' test images (as created in issue dianna-ai/dianna#470) and their KernelSHAP relevance maps .
Evaluate and display the p(average/mean/max/median?) relevancy vs the shape parameter scale for:
Circles. The 'neighbouring' images are defined as ones with close shape parameters (one variable, 2- fixed):
size and
gray-scale contrast
Triangles. The 'neighbouring' images are defined as ones with close shape parameters (one variable, 2- fixed):
size
rotation angle and
gray-scale contrast
Stems from dianna-ai/dianna#446 and #187.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: