Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Excluding 1st dimension when computing SEACells on ATAC data #73

Open
kjtreese opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Excluding 1st dimension when computing SEACells on ATAC data #73

kjtreese opened this issue Oct 9, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@kjtreese
Copy link

kjtreese commented Oct 9, 2024

Hi all! Hope you're well. Thank you so much for providing this great tool :)

This may be a misunderstanding on my part about how the graph-based algorithm works, but typically when doing analyses with ATAC data, the 1st dimension should be excluded since that 1st dimension often correlations with technical variation.. I don't see where I can specify this when computing SEACells on my ATAC data. I'm seeing some technical variation in some SEACells that are grouping 1 or 2 cells from over 100 clusters in our data, and overall it seems like in these cases the cells have lowish fragment counts. I'm wondering if it's possible to exclude the 1st dimension when building the SEACells which might reduce this phenomenon? I did do this when generating my UMAP in the Anndata object, but I'm not sure that ensures the algorithm also excludes it. Thanks in advance!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant