Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Licensing #149

Open
ScottChapman opened this issue Aug 2, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Licensing #149

ScottChapman opened this issue Aug 2, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@ScottChapman
Copy link

Would you mind clarifying your intent with dual licenses? Clearly GPL is pretty restrictive and likely would have undesirable consequences when used in a web client (I think that would be consider static linking and thus apply).

I suspect your intention (language used in package.json) was that either license could apply, it is at the user's discretion?

@brandonfl
Copy link

brandonfl commented Oct 1, 2020

I have the exact same question 😞
Also GPL is restrictive, like, cant use this lib if the lib is in GPL

@did
Copy link

did commented Dec 8, 2021

hey @ejci, first, thanks for your awesome work! And same question as @ScottChapmanWas & @brandonfl. Thanks for your answer!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants