-
I would like to extend a conditional rule so that a term can be defined in two ways:
A working regex for the second case is
I assume that this have to to with capture groups and having both using the same identifier, but unclear if this is possible at all ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 2 comments 2 replies
-
Could you share a real example of what you're trying to match against? One thing to keep in mind, though, is that the definition must appear before any single usages. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
This is now supported thanks to #393. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This is now supported thanks to #393.