Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OpenFeature standard support #1097

Open
MarcinGil opened this issue Dec 13, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

OpenFeature standard support #1097

MarcinGil opened this issue Dec 13, 2023 · 4 comments
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@MarcinGil
Copy link

OpenFeature (https://openfeature.dev/) strives to provide an independent standard for working with feature flags.

A standard access library is called a 'provider' in OpenFeature ecosystem. There are several providers for many vendors already provided there: https://openfeature.dev/ecosystem.

Having FeatureHub provider would greatly ease the integration.

Describe alternatives you've considered
Alternative solution to use directly FeatureHub's SDK is basically a vendor lock-in and my organization is more likely to adopt OpenFeature supported provider.

https://openfeature.dev/
https://openfeature.dev/ecosystem

@rvowles
Copy link
Contributor

rvowles commented Dec 13, 2023

Hi Marcin - we are aware of it. Its certainly something we will need to implement in the near future.

@IrinaSouth IrinaSouth added the help wanted Extra attention is needed label Dec 16, 2023
@IrinaSouth
Copy link
Contributor

We can add this to our roadmap. Community help on this would be much appreciated.

@MMartyn
Copy link

MMartyn commented Nov 12, 2024

This seems promising in terms of not needing to maintain separate SDKs for OpenFeature, but instead expose a compatible API.

@MMartyn
Copy link

MMartyn commented Dec 5, 2024

This seems promising in terms of not needing to maintain separate SDKs for OpenFeature, but instead expose a compatible API.

Actually, I played with this a little and I think we would lose the well designed fallback (cached local eval) and update mechanisms (SSE) if we used the ofrep. So IMO language specific wrappers of the FeatureHub SDKs for OpenFeature would be the path to go.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants