Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FR] Remote config evaluate() #969

Open
luismolina13 opened this issue Jul 29, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

[FR] Remote config evaluate() #969

luismolina13 opened this issue Jul 29, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@luismolina13
Copy link

Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Reading through this: https://firebase.google.com/docs/remote-config/server it seems like server side remote config evaluations is something that could be supported.

Describe the solution you'd like
Allow remote config evaluation from a Java server.

Describe alternatives you've considered
LaunchDarkly

Additional context
Is there an ETA for this to be available?

@google-oss-bot
Copy link

I couldn't figure out how to label this issue, so I've labeled it for a human to triage. Hang tight.

@RafaelGBAccenture
Copy link

Hi Firebase Team,

It would be highly beneficial to have the ability to fetch Firebase Remote Config parameters in real-time on the server-side using the Admin SDK.

Currently, the Admin SDK supports managing and publishing templates for Remote Config, but it doesn’t provide a way to dynamically retrieve these configurations, like the client SDK does (e.g., with fetchAndActivate() for mobile/web). In many server-side use cases (like microservices), it’s important to adapt behavior based on the latest configuration, similar to how front-end applications adjust UI and functionality dynamically.

Having this feature in the Admin SDK would allow developers to access and act on dynamic configuration values from the server, improving flexibility and reducing the need for custom REST API wrappers around Firebase's Remote Config.

I believe this would align the SDK's capabilities across environments and would be a very welcomed addition.

Thanks for considering this feature!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants