Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FDL deprecation #1] Added mobileLinksConfig field for project and tenant configs #2659

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: fdl-deprecation
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Xiaoshouzi-gh
Copy link
Contributor

  1. Added mobileLinksConfig field for project and tenant creation and/or updating workflows.
    This will be later used in Firebase Dynamic links deprecation work.

  2. Fixed some legacy failing tests.

  • Any API changes after the review will be addressed in a different PR.
  • This PR will be merge to the main branch of FDL deprecation work called fdl-deprecation. Later when launched, fdl-deprecation will be merged into master branch.

…updating workflow.

This will be later used in Firebase Dynamic links deprecation work.
Copy link
Member

@lahirumaramba lahirumaramba left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! LGTM!

@@ -51,6 +51,18 @@ describe('ProjectConfig', () => {
},
],
},
recaptchaConfig: {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we need this?
updateProjectConfigRequest3 already has the same update config for recaptcha and I believe we are testing that functionality?

@@ -490,6 +524,7 @@ describe('ProjectConfig', () => {
it('should set readonly property multiFactorConfig', () => {
const expectedMultiFactorConfig = {
state: 'DISABLED',
factorIds: [],
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is this required when state is DISABLED?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants