You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Just wanted to mention that I'm working on an implementation of the openscad language that uses this as the backend. Still quite early, but you can see that here: https://github.com/traverseda/PySdfScad
Openscad is not the best language, but it already exists and a lot of people are already familiar with it. Extending it to support things like fillets/chamfers would be very nice.
I'm a long way from general openscad compatibility, although that's something I intend on working on. There are a number of SDF features that I don't feel I'm currently capable of implement myself that an openscad interpreter would eventually need.
Minkowski sum
Hull operation
mesh (3D and 2D) to SDF
Other than those I think I should eventually be able to make this fully openscad compatible, eventually. Of course I would appreciate help on that front.
After openscad compatibility hopefully comes making something that's a bit better, but honestly I'll be happy to just get it to interpret arbitrary openscad while supporting this projects more advanced features.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Just wanted to mention that I'm working on an implementation of the openscad language that uses this as the backend. Still quite early, but you can see that here: https://github.com/traverseda/PySdfScad
Openscad is not the best language, but it already exists and a lot of people are already familiar with it. Extending it to support things like fillets/chamfers would be very nice.
I'm a long way from general openscad compatibility, although that's something I intend on working on. There are a number of SDF features that I don't feel I'm currently capable of implement myself that an openscad interpreter would eventually need.
Other than those I think I should eventually be able to make this fully openscad compatible, eventually. Of course I would appreciate help on that front.
After openscad compatibility hopefully comes making something that's a bit better, but honestly I'll be happy to just get it to interpret arbitrary openscad while supporting this projects more advanced features.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: