Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Some of my thoughts on Latency hiding #29

Closed
ezrannetttty opened this issue Sep 30, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Some of my thoughts on Latency hiding #29

ezrannetttty opened this issue Sep 30, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@ezrannetttty
Copy link
Contributor

"Can our implementation above be improved? Note that we only need communications to update the values at the boundary of the portion owned by each process. The other values (the one in green in the figure below) can be updated without communications. This provides the opportunity of overlapping the computation of the interior values (green cells in the figure) with the communication of the ghost values. This technique is called latency hiding, since we are hiding communication latency by overlapping it with communication that we need to do anyway.\n",

May I ask if what you are trying to convey is in fact: "we are hiding communication latency by overlapping it with computation that we need to do anyway"?

@fverdugo
Copy link
Owner

fverdugo commented Oct 2, 2023

Dear @ezrannetttty,

yes, this is indeed a typo.

with communication that we need to do anyway -> with computation that we need to do anyway.

Feel free to open a PR.

@ezrannetttty
Copy link
Contributor Author

ezrannetttty commented Oct 2, 2023

Dear @fverdugo,

The new PR has been submitted. It feels great to contribute.

BTW, the teaching materials you've written are of very high quality and have been extremely helpful for me in understanding parallel computing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants