-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 107
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Question regarding a part of the paper #25
Comments
|
The proof of why x and its gradient are orthogonal is in Appendix 8.5. |
I am not asking about why they are orthogonal. I am asking about the line after that, the line after you say they are orthogonal. How does this lead to the geometric perspective you mentioned? |
Tangent space is a space spanned by all the tangent line. The gradient is orthogonal with x, so it is in the tangent space. The gradient is actually a vector. I draw it from the end of x because when updating x, we minus lr * gradient from the x. |
Shouldn't the gradient vector |
The gradient w.r.t. \bar{x} can be in any direction, but the gradient w.r.t. x is orthogonal with x. |
I'm also confused about that. Why the gradient w.r.t. x is the projection of the gradient w.r.t. \bar{x} |
Can I know why "From the geometric perspective, ...normal vector x"?
Also, I can't quite understand your figure 4 too. Why$\frac{\partial L}{\partial \bar{x}}$ points in the south east direction?
Do you mind explaining?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: