We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
the current DidSovResolver is only returning 1 VM, #1 and it's only responsibility is "key agreement".
#1
https://sovrin-foundation.github.io/sovrin/spec/did-method-spec-template.html#crud-operation-definitions
The returned VMs should be re-evaluated against the spec. a few notes:
#key-1
#key-agreement-1
we should have testing against the spec.
sample obj
DidDocument { id: Did { did: "did:sov:Dd92jXuEvTerjhTiKnSc27", method: Some( "sov", ), id: "Dd92jXuEvTerjhTiKnSc27", namespace: None, }, also_known_as: [], controller: None, verification_method: [ VerificationMethod { id: DidUrl { did_url: "#1", did: None, method: None, namespace: None, id: None, path: None, fragment: Some( 1..2, ), queries: {}, }, controller: Did { did: "did:sov:Dd92jXuEvTerjhTiKnSc27", method: Some( "sov", ), id: "Dd92jXuEvTerjhTiKnSc27", namespace: None, }, verification_method_type: Ed25519VerificationKey2018, public_key: Base58 { public_key_base58: "7t3LhTzn6abJV3HFEwPeKb7gs7K6U4xCUeE4ezHNLcFL", }, }, ], authentication: [], assertion_method: [], key_agreement: [ Resolvable( DidUrl { did_url: "#1", did: None, method: None, namespace: None, id: None, path: None, fragment: Some( 1..2, ), queries: {}, }, ), ], capability_invocation: [], capability_delegation: [], service: [], extra: {}, }
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
the current DidSovResolver is only returning 1 VM,
#1
and it's only responsibility is "key agreement".https://sovrin-foundation.github.io/sovrin/spec/did-method-spec-template.html#crud-operation-definitions
The returned VMs should be re-evaluated against the spec. a few notes:
#1
should be#key-1
#key-1
should be referenced in authentication and assertion lists#key-agreement-1
, which should reference the X25119 version of the#key-1
VMwe should have testing against the spec.
sample obj
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: