This is version 3 of WAVE, which is not yet ready for production use. If you are looking for the widely-deployed BOSS WAVE system, please go to github.com/immesys/bw2
WAVE version 3 is no longer built on top of a blockchain, instead we have a horizontally scalable VLDM-based storage tier. We also have increased privacy of Attestations (formerly Delegations of Trust or DOTs) by adding a reverse-discoverable decryption mechanism.
Grab a release from the release tab. This will contain two binaries: waved
which runs as a background process providing wave services, and wv
the command line utility. We hope to have an installer in the near future, but for now you can either run waved
with systemd (a unit file is provided) or in another tab.
Lets create some entities to represent an organisation:
./wv mke -o company.namespace --nopassphrase
wrote entity: company.namespace
./wv mke -o alice --nopassphrase
wrote entity: alice
Lets also create a permission set
which is an entity that uniquely identifies the meaning of a set of permission strings. This is so that one person's idea of what read
means doesn't accidentally get confused with another person's idea. It is likely that an application developer would create a permission set for their application:
./wv mke -o myapp --nopassphrase
Now lets say that the company grants alice the permission to read all resources within the company namespace.
./wv rtgrant --attester company.namespace --indirections 5 --subject alice myapp:read@company.namespace/*
wrote attestation: att_GyBM5VDtIDPuWYSx6Cw6XVmeFbmdZLi5hL0qy9Acl-0jyQ==.pem
published attestation
With this, alice should be able to prove she has permissions on a resource, like company.namespace/foo
:
./wv rtprove --subject alice myapp:read@company.namespace/foo
Synchronized 3/3 entities
Perspective graph sync complete
wrote proof: proof_2018-07-25T15:48:47-07:00.pem
The proof has been written out to a file, anyone can verify the proof as follows:
./wv verify proof_2018-07-25T15\:48\:47-07\:00.pem
Referenced attestations:
[00] Hash: GyBM5VDtIDPuWYSx6Cw6XVmeFbmdZLi5hL0qy9Acl-0jyQ==
Paths:
[00] 00
Subject: GyBVOAZJXLDqWGncj2C-yieCwy8vsfT8QDl6u0V-ds3Z-Q==
SubjectLoc: default
Expires: 2018-08-24 15:40:58 -0700 PDT
Policy: RTree
Namespace: GyBIOr311-I6UE_9T0lYIoIZsLZaSWRWyuz8SJsrUJs3vw==
Indirections: 5
Statements:
[00] Permission set: GyDYbnBfVzeJTzUcPgFF3IeY0VuhmRSMEZwusAp_WKndJw==
Permissions: read
URI: *
This yields a policy
that shows the permissions that the proof is proving alice has.
In the above examples, we could easily refer to alice
, myapp
and company.namespace
because the files existed in the current directory. We would otherwise have to refer to these entities by their full hash. To make it easier, WAVE also has a directory mechanism that allows you to name other entities and share those names with other people. Lets name the myapp
entity superapp
. For now we will show public names that anyone can read:
./wv name --attester company.namespace --public myapp superapp
name "superapp" -> "GyDYbnBfVzeJTzUcPgFF3IeY0VuhmRSMEZwusAp_WKndJw==" created successfully
Now lets also say that alice decides to name her company acme
but she wants this to be a private name that only she can see:
./wv name --attester alice company.namespace acme
name "acme" -> "GyBIOr311-I6UE_9T0lYIoIZsLZaSWRWyuz8SJsrUJs3vw==" created successfully
Alice can now refer to the app permission set as superapp.acme
because she has privately named the company namespace entity acme
and that entity publicly named the permission set entity superapp
:
./wv resolve --perspective alice superapp.acme
Perspective graph sync complete
"superapp.acme":
= Entity
Location: default
Hash: GyDYbnBfVzeJTzUcPgFF3IeY0VuhmRSMEZwusAp_WKndJw==
Known as: superapp.acme
Created: 2018-07-25 15:46:10 -0700 PDT
Expires: 2018-08-24 15:46:10 -0700 PDT
Validity:
- Valid: true
- Expired: false
- Malformed: false
- Revoked: false
- Message:
Lets say there is another employee the company knows as bob:
./wv mke -o bob.ent --nopassphrase
wrote entity: bob.ent
./wv name --attester company.namespace --public bob.ent bob
name "bob" -> "GyDepqXkTWQB6zyMfBi6ZabkkWMXVTd64nJZg_9W4mXZJg==" created successfully
Alice can now grant permissions to bob using the names that the company created:
./wv rtgrant --attester alice --subject bob.acme superapp.acme:read@acme/*
wrote attestation: att_GyDe_hk7nBWHft3m61dzYa3-iHorXCDxRc0MZxRMX8NFmw==.pem
published attestation
And bob can prove that, after he names the company as well:
./wv name --attester bob company.namespace acme
name "acme" -> "GyBIOr311-I6UE_9T0lYIoIZsLZaSWRWyuz8SJsrUJs3vw==" created successfully
./wv rtprove --subject bob superapp.acme:read@acme/foo
Perspective graph sync complete
wrote proof: proof_2018-07-25T16:33:01-07:00.pem