You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I'd like to do less I/O than a full scrub, but auto-repair important things. What about a filter to skip file contents or single block groups?
I have a USB 2 drive, attached to my desktop, with Data,single (70 GB) and Metadata,DUP (3 GB). I keep backups.
I've been told that, in case of a bad block, the userspace will always see I/O error and never see corrupted data. So if I understand correctly, I should not scrub to protect sensitive data, but to trade I/O for the estimated time spent in restoring from backups.
I'd like to scrub and auto-repair metadata, to prevent that a directory corruption breaks part of the filesystem and interrupts my work.
I'd not scrub the file contents, 70 GB over USB 2 (that's slow). The disk is new (no bad blocks). A random broken file every now and then will probably go unnoticed, but I can quickly restore it. Data is single and unrepairable.
I do not read the scrub log. Regardless of how often bad blocks will be reported, the disk is for desktop usage at home, so I'll replace it at 10-15 years of age, before the day that I turn on the PC and the disk does not spin up.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'd like to do less I/O than a full scrub, but auto-repair important things. What about a filter to skip file contents or single block groups?
I have a USB 2 drive, attached to my desktop, with
Data,single
(70 GB) andMetadata,DUP
(3 GB). I keep backups.I've been told that, in case of a bad block, the userspace will always see I/O error and never see corrupted data. So if I understand correctly, I should not scrub to protect sensitive data, but to trade I/O for the estimated time spent in restoring from backups.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: