Workflow bundling for runtime #4
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes introduce new data structures and interfaces for project bundling in the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 16
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
projectBundler/projectBundler_test.go (1)
1-6: Suggestions for improving the test fileWhile this is a good start for testing the ProjectBundler, consider the following improvements:
Add more test functions to cover different aspects of the ProjectBundler. For example:
Test_DiscoverProjectsTest_LoadProjectConfigTest_ValidateProjectConfigUse table-driven tests where appropriate to test multiple scenarios efficiently.
Consider adding benchmarks if there are performance-critical parts of the ProjectBundler.
Add comments explaining the purpose of each test function and any complex test setups.
These suggestions will help create a more comprehensive and maintainable test suite for the ProjectBundler package.
testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest2/workflow.ts (2)
3-7: LGTM. Consider adding documentation forworkflowSettings.The
workflowSettingsobject is well-structured and provides clear configuration for the workflow. However, to improve maintainability and clarity, consider adding JSDoc comments to explain the purpose and impact of each setting, especiallyresetClaims.Here's a suggested documentation format:
/** * Configuration settings for the token generation workflow. * @property {string} id - Unique identifier for this workflow. * @property {string} trigger - Event that triggers this workflow. * @property {boolean} resetClaims - Whether to reset existing claims before processing. */ export const workflowSettings = { // ... (existing code) };
15-15: Improve error logging.The current error log
console.error('error log')doesn't provide any meaningful information. Consider including more context or specific error details in your error logs.Suggested improvement:
console.error('Error occurred during token generation', { event, error: 'Specific error message or object' });workflowBundler/workflowBoundler_test.go (1)
1-8: Consider aligning the package name with the directory name.The package is currently named
builder, but the file is located in theworkflowBundlerdirectory. To improve code organization and readability, it's generally a good practice to have the package name match the directory name.Consider changing the package declaration to:
-package builder +package workflowbundlerThis change would make the package structure more intuitive and consistent with Go conventions.
projectBundler/projectBundler.go (3)
9-11: Consider using a more concise field name.The
KindeWorkflowstruct is well-defined, but the field nameWorkflowRootDirectorycould be more concise. Consider shortening it toRootDirfor consistency with theProjectConfigurationstruct and improved readability.Here's a suggested change:
type KindeWorkflow struct { - WorkflowRootDirectory string `json:"workflow_root_directory"` + RootDir string `json:"root_dir"` }
16-18: LGTM: KindeEnvironment struct is well-defined with room for expansion.The
KindeEnvironmentstruct is correctly defined, encapsulating theKindeWorkflows. This structure allows for easy addition of other environment-related fields in the future, such as environment variables, configuration settings, or runtime information.Consider if there are any other environment-specific attributes that might be useful to include in this struct as the project evolves.
1-28: Overall, well-structured code with room for minor improvements and documentation.The
projectBundler.gofile provides a solid foundation for project bundling with well-defined structs and a clear interface. The separation of concerns between project configuration, workflows, and environment is commendable.To further improve the code:
- Consider the suggested refinements in the previous comments.
- Add package-level documentation to explain the purpose and usage of these types.
- Include comments for each struct and the interface to describe their roles and any important details.
Adding comprehensive documentation will greatly enhance the maintainability and usability of this package, especially as it grows and evolves.
workflowBundler/workflowBoundler.go (1)
86-92: LGTM: Utility methods are concise and effective.Both
HasOutputandaddErrormethods are well-implemented and serve their purposes effectively.Once the "Boundle" typo is fixed in the
BundlerResultstruct, remember to update theHasOutputmethod accordingly:func (br *BundlerResult) HasOutput() bool { - return len(br.Boundle.Source) > 0 + return len(br.Bundle.Source) > 0 }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (3)
go.modis excluded by!**/*.modgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum,!**/*.sumtestData/kinde.jsonis excluded by!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (8)
- projectBundler/projectBundler.go (1 hunks)
- projectBundler/projectBundler_test.go (1 hunks)
- testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest/hello.ts (1 hunks)
- testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest/workflow.ts (1 hunks)
- testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest2/hello.ts (1 hunks)
- testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest2/workflow.ts (1 hunks)
- workflowBundler/workflowBoundler.go (1 hunks)
- workflowBundler/workflowBoundler_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (14)
testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest/hello.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM! Consider adding a comment to explain the file's purpose.The code is simple, correct, and follows TypeScript syntax. However, the purpose of this file in the context of workflow bundling is not immediately clear.
Could you please clarify the intended use of this file in the workflow bundling process? If it's a test case or example, consider adding a comment to explain its purpose. This would improve the codebase's maintainability and help other developers understand its role in the project.
To verify if this file is referenced elsewhere in the project, you can run the following command:
This will help determine if and where this module is being used in the project.
testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest2/hello.ts (1)
1-1: LGTM, but could you provide more context?The code is syntactically correct and follows good practices for exporting a constant. However, I have a few points for consideration:
Could you clarify the purpose of this constant and how it fits into the larger workflow? Understanding its role would help ensure it's appropriately placed and named.
If this constant is only used in one place, consider inlining it in the file where it's used instead of having a separate file. This could simplify the project structure, especially if many such small constants are created.
If this is intended as a reusable piece of text, perhaps consider using a more descriptive name that indicates its purpose, e.g.,
greetingTextordefaultGreeting.Let's check if this constant is used elsewhere in the project:
Verification successful
Confirmed no external imports for
helloconstant.The
helloconstant is only used withinhello.ts. If it's not intended for reuse elsewhere, consider inlining it to simplify the project structure.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for imports of 'hello' from this file rg --type typescript "import.*hello.*from.*evTest2/hello"Length of output: 94
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for imports of 'hello' from this file rg "import.*hello.*from.*evTest2/hello" -g '*.ts'Length of output: 51
projectBundler/projectBundler_test.go (2)
1-1: LGTM: Package declaration is correct.The package name
project_bundlerfollows Go naming conventions and matches the directory name, which is a good practice.
3-3: LGTM: Import statement is correct.The
testingpackage is correctly imported, which is necessary for writing Go tests. The empty lines before and after the import statement improve readability.testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest/workflow.ts (1)
3-7: LGTM: workflowSettings constantThe
workflowSettingsconstant is well-defined with appropriate properties for a token generation workflow.testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest2/workflow.ts (2)
11-12:⚠️ Potential issueEnsure
kindeobject is properly imported and typed.The
kindeobject is used to set custom claims, but it's not imported or defined in this file. This could lead to runtime errors ifkindeis not globally available.To verify the availability and usage of the
kindeobject, run the following script:#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the import and usage of the 'kinde' object # Test 1: Search for 'kinde' import statement rg --type typescript 'import.*kinde' testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/ # Test 2: Search for global declarations of 'kinde' rg --type typescript 'declare.*kinde' testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/ # Test 3: Search for usage of 'kinde' object rg --type typescript 'kinde\.' testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/If no import or declaration is found, consider adding an import statement or a type declaration for
kinde.
1-1: Verify the usage of the importedhellofunction.The
hellofunction is imported from a local module, but its usage in the code is not immediately clear. Ensure that this import is necessary and used effectively within the workflow.To confirm the usage of the
hellofunction, run the following script:projectBundler/projectBundler.go (3)
4-7: LGTM: ProjectConfiguration struct is well-defined.The
ProjectConfigurationstruct is clearly defined with appropriate fields and JSON tags. The field names are self-explanatory, which enhances code readability.
12-14: LGTM: KindeWorkflows struct is well-defined.The
KindeWorkflowsstruct is appropriately defined as a container for multipleKindeWorkflowinstances. The use of a slice and the plural naming convention is correct.
20-23: LGTM: KindeProject struct demonstrates good design principles.The
KindeProjectstruct is well-structured, clearly separating project configuration from environment details. This design promotes modularity and makes it easier to manage and extend project-related data in the future.The clear separation of concerns between
ConfigurationandEnvironmentis a good architectural decision.workflowBundler/workflowBoundler.go (4)
1-7: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are appropriate.The package name "builder" aligns well with the builder pattern implementation. The imports are minimal and relevant to the functionality, which is a good practice.
9-33: LGTM: Well-structured type definitions.The defined types (BundledContent, BundlerResult, BundlerOptions, WorkflowBundler interface, and builder struct) appear to cover the necessary aspects of the bundling process effectively.
35-39: LGTM: Appropriate factory function implementation.The
newWorkflowBundlerfunction follows the factory pattern correctly, creating and returning a new instance of thebuilderstruct with the provided options.
41-84: LGTM: Comprehensive Bundle method implementation.The
Bundlemethod covers all necessary aspects of the bundling process, including setting up build options, calling theapi.Buildfunction, and processing the result.
| func Test_ProjectBunler(t *testing.T) { | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in function name and implement test logic.
There are two issues with the test function:
- There's a typo in the function name: "Bunler" should be "Bundler".
- The function body is empty, indicating that test logic still needs to be implemented.
Please apply the following changes:
- Correct the function name:
-func Test_ProjectBunler(t *testing.T) {
+func Test_ProjectBundler(t *testing.T) {- Implement the test logic. As an example:
func Test_ProjectBundler(t *testing.T) {
// TODO: Implement test cases for ProjectBundler
t.Run("Test case description", func(t *testing.T) {
// Add assertions here
})
}Would you like assistance in designing and implementing specific test cases for the ProjectBundler?
| kinde.idToken.setCustomClaim('random', 'test'); | ||
| kinde.accessToken.setCustomClaim('test2', {"test2": hello}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Address undefined variables and improve type safety
There are a few issues in these lines:
- The
kindeobject is used without being imported or defined. - The
hellovariable in the custom claim is undefined (it was imported as a function, not used as an object). - The types of the custom claims are not explicitly defined.
Consider the following changes:
- Import or define the
kindeobject:
import { kinde } from '@kinde-oss/kinde-auth-node';- Use the
hellofunction correctly:
- kinde.accessToken.setCustomClaim('test2', {"test2": hello});
+ kinde.accessToken.setCustomClaim('test2', {"test2": hello()});- Define types for the custom claims:
interface RandomClaim {
random: string;
}
interface Test2Claim {
test2: string; // Adjust this type based on what hello() returns
}
kinde.idToken.setCustomClaim<RandomClaim>('random', { random: 'test' });
kinde.accessToken.setCustomClaim<Test2Claim>('test2', { test2: hello() });| kinde.idToken.setCustomClaim('random', 'test'); | ||
| kinde.accessToken.setCustomClaim('test2', {"test2": hello}); | ||
| console.log('logging from action', {"balh": "blah"}); | ||
| await kinde.fetch("http://google.com"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling and URL safety
The current fetch request lacks error handling and uses a hardcoded URL that might not be intended for production.
Consider the following improvements:
- Add error handling:
try {
await kinde.fetch("http://google.com");
} catch (error) {
console.error('Fetch request failed:', error);
// Handle the error appropriately
}- Use a configuration variable for the URL instead of hardcoding it:
const API_URL = process.env.API_URL || 'https://api.example.com';
await kinde.fetch(API_URL);Also, ensure that the URL is using HTTPS in production environments.
| console.log('logging from action', {"balh": "blah"}); | ||
| await kinde.fetch("http://google.com"); | ||
| console.error('error log'); | ||
| return 'testing return'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve function return value
The function always returns 'testing return', which doesn't provide any meaningful information about the operation's success or failure.
Consider returning a more informative result:
return { success: true, message: 'Token generation workflow completed successfully' };You might also want to adjust the return type of the function to match this new structure:
async handle(event: TokenGenerationEvent): Promise<{ success: boolean; message: string }> {
// ... existing code ...
return { success: true, message: 'Token generation workflow completed successfully' };
}| @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ | |||
| import {hello} from "./hello" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove unused import
The hello function is imported but never used in this file. Consider removing this import to keep the code clean and avoid potential confusion.
Apply this diff to remove the unused import:
-import {hello} from "./hello"Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| import {hello} from "./hello" |
| bundlerResult := workflowBuilder.Bundle() | ||
|
|
||
| assert := assert.New(t) | ||
| assert.Nil(bundlerResult.Errors) | ||
| assert.NotEmpty(bundlerResult.Boundle.Source) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo and enhance test assertions.
There's a typo in the assertion, and the test could benefit from more specific checks and error messages.
Consider applying these changes:
bundlerResult := workflowBuilder.Bundle()
assert := assert.New(t)
-assert.Nil(bundlerResult.Errors)
-assert.NotEmpty(bundlerResult.Boundle.Source)
+assert.Nil(bundlerResult.Errors, "Expected no errors from bundling")
+assert.NotEmpty(bundlerResult.Bundle.Source, "Expected non-empty bundle source")
+
+// Consider adding more specific assertions, for example:
+// assert.Contains(bundlerResult.Bundle.Source, "expected_function_name", "Bundle should contain the expected function")
+// assert.NotContains(bundlerResult.Bundle.Source, "console.log", "Bundle should not contain debug statements")These changes correct the typo (Boundle to Bundle), add more informative error messages, and suggest additional assertions to make the test more robust.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| bundlerResult := workflowBuilder.Bundle() | |
| assert := assert.New(t) | |
| assert.Nil(bundlerResult.Errors) | |
| assert.NotEmpty(bundlerResult.Boundle.Source) | |
| } | |
| bundlerResult := workflowBuilder.Bundle() | |
| assert := assert.New(t) | |
| assert.Nil(bundlerResult.Errors, "Expected no errors from bundling") | |
| assert.NotEmpty(bundlerResult.Bundle.Source, "Expected non-empty bundle source") | |
| // Consider adding more specific assertions, for example: | |
| // assert.Contains(bundlerResult.Bundle.Source, "expected_function_name", "Bundle should contain the expected function") | |
| // assert.NotContains(bundlerResult.Bundle.Source, "console.log", "Bundle should not contain debug statements") | |
| } |
projectBundler/projectBundler.go
Outdated
| ProjectBundler interface { | ||
| Discover() KindeProject | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing the ProjectBundler interface for better error handling and context support.
While the ProjectBundler interface is simple and focused, it could benefit from some enhancements:
- The
Discover()method could be more specific, e.g.,DiscoverProject(). - Consider adding error handling by returning an error along with the
KindeProject. - For better support of cancellation and timeouts, consider adding a context parameter.
Here's a suggested improvement:
type ProjectBundler interface {
- Discover() KindeProject
+ DiscoverProject(ctx context.Context) (KindeProject, error)
}This change would allow for more robust error handling and support for cancellation or timeouts via the context.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ProjectBundler interface { | |
| Discover() KindeProject | |
| } | |
| ProjectBundler interface { | |
| DiscoverProject(ctx context.Context) (KindeProject, error) | |
| } |
workflowBundler/workflowBoundler.go
Outdated
| } | ||
|
|
||
| BundlerResult struct { | ||
| Boundle BundledContent |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix typo in BundlerResult struct.
There's a typo in the BundlerResult struct: "Boundle" should be "Bundle".
Please apply the following change:
type BundlerResult struct {
- Boundle BundledContent
+ Bundle BundledContent
Errors []error
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Boundle BundledContent | |
| type BundlerResult struct { | |
| Bundle BundledContent | |
| Errors []error | |
| } |
workflowBundler/workflowBoundler.go
Outdated
| tr := api.Build(opts) | ||
|
|
||
| result := BundlerResult{} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling for api.Build.
The current implementation doesn't handle errors that might be returned by api.Build. Consider adding error checking and handling for tr.Errors.
Suggested improvement:
tr := api.Build(opts)
result := BundlerResult{}
+
+for _, err := range tr.Errors {
+ result.addError(err)
+}
+
+if len(result.Errors) > 0 {
+ return result
+}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
registry/runtimeRegistry.go (2)
66-68: Approve addition of IntrospectionResult interfaceThe new
IntrospectionResultinterface is a good addition, providing a structure for workflow introspection results. TheGetID()method suggests each result will have a unique identifier.To improve documentation and maintainability, consider adding a comment explaining the purpose and expected use of this interface. For example:
// IntrospectionResult represents the result of a workflow introspection. // It provides a unique identifier for the introspection result. type IntrospectionResult interface { GetID() string }
70-73: Approve updates to Runner interfaceThe changes to the
Runnerinterface are well-structured and consistent with the other modifications:
- The
Executemethod now correctly returnsExecutionResultinstead ofResult.- The new
Introspectmethod has been added, which returns anIntrospectionResult.These changes enhance the workflow execution and introspection capabilities.
To improve documentation and maintainability, consider adding comments for both methods, especially the new
Introspectmethod. For example:type Runner interface { // Execute runs a workflow with the given descriptor and start options. // It returns an ExecutionResult or an error if the execution fails. Execute(ctx context.Context, workflow WorkflowDescriptor, startOptions StartOptions) (ExecutionResult, error) // Introspect performs introspection on a workflow with the given descriptor. // It returns an IntrospectionResult or an error if the introspection fails. Introspect(ctx context.Context, workflow WorkflowDescriptor) (IntrospectionResult, error) }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files ignored due to path filters (2)
go.modis excluded by!**/*.modgo.sumis excluded by!**/*.sum,!**/*.sum
Files selected for processing (6)
- gojaRuntime/gojaRuntime.go (3 hunks)
- registry/runtimeRegistry.go (1 hunks)
- runtime_test.go (0 hunks)
- testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest/workflow.ts (1 hunks)
- workflowBundler/workflowBoundler.go (1 hunks)
- workflowBundler/workflowBoundler_test.go (1 hunks)
Files not reviewed due to no reviewable changes (1)
- runtime_test.go
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest/workflow.ts
- workflowBundler/workflowBoundler.go
- workflowBundler/workflowBoundler_test.go
Additional comments not posted (1)
registry/runtimeRegistry.go (1)
59-73: Summary of changes and suggestion for comprehensive testingThe changes in this file enhance the runtime registry by:
- Renaming
ResulttoExecutionResultfor clarity.- Introducing a new
IntrospectionResultinterface for workflow introspection.- Updating the
Runnerinterface to support both execution and introspection.These modifications improve the overall design and capabilities of the system. However, they may require updates in other parts of the codebase that use these interfaces.
To ensure the changes are fully integrated and functioning as expected, consider the following:
- Update all existing unit tests that use the
Resultinterface to now useExecutionResult.- Add new unit tests for the
IntrospectionResultinterface and its implementations.- Extend existing
Runnerinterface tests to cover the newIntrospectmethod.- Create integration tests that demonstrate the new workflow introspection capability.
To help identify areas that may need testing updates, run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Identify test files that may need updates due to interface changes. # Test: Find test files that might be affected by the Result to ExecutionResult change. echo "Test files potentially affected by Result to ExecutionResult change:" rg --type go '\bResult\b' --glob '*_test.go' # Test: Identify existing Runner interface tests that should be updated. echo "\nExisting Runner interface tests (update these to include Introspect method):" rg --type go 'func TestRunner' --glob '*_test.go'
| ExecutionResult interface { | ||
| GetExitResult() interface{} | ||
| GetConsoleLog() []interface{} | ||
| GetConsoleError() []interface{} | ||
| GetContext() map[string]interface{} | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Issues Found
- Remaining instances of
Resultfound ingojaRuntime.go. Please update these toExecutionResult. Runnerinterface tests do not include the newIntrospectmethod. Please add appropriate tests.
Analysis chain
Approve renaming of Result to ExecutionResult
The renaming of Result to ExecutionResult improves clarity and better reflects its purpose. This change is consistent with the updated method signature in the Runner interface.
To ensure all usages of this interface have been updated, please run the following script:
Further Verification Needed
To ensure the renaming is comprehensive and that the Runner interface tests include the Introspect method, please run the following scripts:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all occurrences of the old interface name have been updated.
# Test: Search for any remaining instances of the old interface name. Expect: No results.
rg --type go '\bResult\b' --glob '!registry/runtimeRegistry.go'
# Test: Confirm the new interface name is used correctly. Expect: Occurrences of ExecutionResult.
rg --type go '\bExecutionResult\b'
Length of output: 412
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify all occurrences of the old interface name have been updated in both source and test files.
# Test: Search for any remaining instances of the old interface name. Expect: No results.
rg --type go '\bResult\b' --glob '!registry/runtimeRegistry.go'
# Test: Confirm the new interface name is used correctly. Expect: Occurrences of ExecutionResult.
rg --type go '\bExecutionResult\b'
Length of output: 985
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Ensure that Runner interface tests include the new Introspect method.
# Test: Search for tests of the Runner interface to confirm Introspect method is included.
rg --type go 'func TestRunner.*Introspect' --glob '*_test.go'
Length of output: 63
| if returnErr != nil { | ||
| return executionResult, returnErr |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ensure consistent error handling between Introspect and Execute methods
In the Execute method, when setupVM returns an error, you return executionResult and returnErr (line 126). However, in the Introspect method, you return nil and returnErr (line 100) when an error occurs. This inconsistency might lead to confusion and potential nil pointer dereferences if the caller expects a nil result when an error occurs. Consider returning nil as the result in the Execute method when an error occurs to maintain consistency.
Apply this diff to standardize error handling:
if returnErr != nil {
- return executionResult, returnErr
+ return nil, returnErr
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if returnErr != nil { | |
| return executionResult, returnErr | |
| if returnErr != nil { | |
| return nil, returnErr |
gojaRuntime/gojaRuntime.go
Outdated
| if settingsExport != nil { | ||
| settings := settingsExport.Export().(map[string]interface{}) | ||
|
|
||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("error compiling %w", err) | ||
| if val, ok := settings["id"]; ok { | ||
| introspectionResult.ID = val.(string) | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle potential type assertion panic when exporting settings
The type assertion on line 110: settings := settingsExport.Export().(map[string]interface{}) may panic if settingsExport.Export() does not return a map[string]interface{}. To prevent a potential runtime panic, consider using a type assertion with the ok idiom to safely handle cases where the type assertion may fail.
Apply this diff to safely perform the type assertion:
if settingsExport != nil {
- settings := settingsExport.Export().(map[string]interface{})
+ settingsValue := settingsExport.Export()
+ settings, ok := settingsValue.(map[string]interface{})
+ if !ok {
+ return nil, fmt.Errorf("workflowSettings is not a map[string]interface{}")
+ }
if val, ok := settings["id"]; ok {
introspectionResult.ID = val.(string)
}
}Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
registry/runtimeRegistry.go (1)
59-79: Add documentation comments for exported interfaces and methodsTo improve code readability and maintainability, add documentation comments for the exported interfaces and their methods:
ExecutionResultIntrospectedExportIntrospectionResultIntrospectionOptionsThis helps other developers understand the purpose and usage of these interfaces and structures.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (4)
- gojaRuntime/gojaRuntime.go (3 hunks)
- registry/runtimeRegistry.go (1 hunks)
- workflowBundler/workflowBoundler.go (1 hunks)
- workflowBundler/workflowBoundler_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- workflowBundler/workflowBoundler.go
- workflowBundler/workflowBoundler_test.go
Additional comments not posted (6)
gojaRuntime/gojaRuntime.go (6)
26-32: LGTM: New structs for introspectionThe new
introspectedExportandintrospectionResultstructs are well-defined and serve a clear purpose for the introspection functionality. The naming is consistent with Go conventions.
35-62: LGTM: Methods for introspection structsThe methods for
introspectedExportandintrospectionResultare well-implemented and provide the necessary functionality for the introspection feature. TherecordExportmethod being unexported is appropriate for internal use.
121-147: LGTM: Introspect method implementationThe
Introspectmethod is well-implemented, providing the necessary functionality for introspecting workflow exports. It correctly uses thesetupVMfunction for code reuse and handles errors consistently. The method efficiently iterates through the requested exports and records them in theintrospectionResult.
149-155: LGTM: Updated Execute methodThe
Executemethod has been refactored to use thesetupVMfunction, making it more concise and consistent with theIntrospectmethod. The error handling is appropriate and consistent with previous recommendations.
212-265: LGTM: setupVM function implementationThe
setupVMfunction is well-implemented, encapsulating the VM setup logic used by bothIntrospectandExecutemethods. It correctly configures the VM, sets up bindings, and uses a cache for compiled programs, which is good for performance. The error handling is consistent and appropriate throughout the function.
149-149: Verify impact of return type changeThe return type of the
Executemethod has changed fromResulttoExecutionResult. This change might affect external code that relies on this method.Please run the following script to check for any uses of the
Executemethod that might be affected by this change:
| // ValueAsMap implements runtime_registry.IntrospectedExport. | ||
| func (i introspectedExport) ValueAsMap() map[string]interface{} { | ||
| if i.value == nil { | ||
| return map[string]interface{}{} | ||
| } | ||
| return i.value.(map[string]interface{}) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider safer type assertion in ValueAsMap method
The ValueAsMap method uses a type assertion that could potentially panic if the value is not of type map[string]interface{}.
Consider using a type assertion with the ok idiom to safely handle cases where the type assertion may fail:
func (i introspectedExport) ValueAsMap() map[string]interface{} {
if i.value == nil {
return map[string]interface{}{}
}
- return i.value.(map[string]interface{})
+ if m, ok := i.value.(map[string]interface{}); ok {
+ return m
+ }
+ return map[string]interface{}{}
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // ValueAsMap implements runtime_registry.IntrospectedExport. | |
| func (i introspectedExport) ValueAsMap() map[string]interface{} { | |
| if i.value == nil { | |
| return map[string]interface{}{} | |
| } | |
| return i.value.(map[string]interface{}) | |
| } | |
| // ValueAsMap implements runtime_registry.IntrospectedExport. | |
| func (i introspectedExport) ValueAsMap() map[string]interface{} { | |
| if i.value == nil { | |
| return map[string]interface{}{} | |
| } | |
| if m, ok := i.value.(map[string]interface{}); ok { | |
| return m | |
| } | |
| return map[string]interface{}{} | |
| } |
| IntrospectionResult interface { | ||
| GetExport(string) IntrospectedExport | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Rename 'GetExport' to 'Export' in 'IntrospectionResult' interface
Following Go's naming conventions, consider renaming the GetExport method to Export in the IntrospectionResult interface.
Apply this diff to rename the method:
IntrospectionResult interface {
- GetExport(string) IntrospectedExport
+ Export(string) IntrospectedExport
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| IntrospectionResult interface { | |
| GetExport(string) IntrospectedExport | |
| } | |
| IntrospectionResult interface { | |
| Export(string) IntrospectedExport | |
| } |
| ExecutionResult interface { | ||
| GetExitResult() interface{} | ||
| GetConsoleLog() []interface{} | ||
| GetConsoleError() []interface{} | ||
| GetContext() map[string]interface{} | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor accessor method names to follow Go conventions
In Go, it's idiomatic to omit the Get prefix from accessor methods. Consider renaming the methods in the ExecutionResult interface:
GetExitResult()➔ExitResult()GetConsoleLog()➔ConsoleLog()GetConsoleError()➔ConsoleError()GetContext()➔Context()
Apply this diff to update the method names:
ExecutionResult interface {
- GetExitResult() interface{}
- GetConsoleLog() []interface{}
- GetConsoleError() []interface{}
- GetContext() map[string]interface{}
+ ExitResult() interface{}
+ ConsoleLog() []interface{}
+ ConsoleError() []interface{}
+ Context() map[string]interface{}
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| ExecutionResult interface { | |
| GetExitResult() interface{} | |
| GetConsoleLog() []interface{} | |
| GetConsoleError() []interface{} | |
| GetContext() map[string]interface{} | |
| } | |
| ExecutionResult interface { | |
| ExitResult() interface{} | |
| ConsoleLog() []interface{} | |
| ConsoleError() []interface{} | |
| Context() map[string]interface{} | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
registry/runtimeRegistry.go (2)
53-58: Approve renaming, but consider removing "Get" prefix from methodsThe renaming of
ResulttoExecutionResultis a good change that improves clarity. However, as mentioned in a previous review comment, it's more idiomatic in Go to omit the "Get" prefix from accessor methods.Consider updating the method names as follows:
ExecutionResult interface { - GetExitResult() interface{} - GetConsoleLog() []interface{} - GetConsoleError() []interface{} - GetContext() map[string]interface{} + ExitResult() interface{} + ConsoleLog() []interface{} + ConsoleError() []interface{} + Context() map[string]interface{} }
66-68: Approve new interface, but consider renaming methodThe new
IntrospectionResultinterface is a good addition. However, as mentioned in a previous review comment, it's more idiomatic in Go to omit the "Get" prefix from accessor methods.Consider renaming the method as follows:
IntrospectionResult interface { - GetExport(string) IntrospectedExport + Export(string) IntrospectedExport }
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (3)
- registry/runtimeRegistry.go (3 hunks)
- workflowBundler/workflowBoundler.go (1 hunks)
- workflowBundler/workflowBoundler_test.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- workflowBundler/workflowBoundler.go
- workflowBundler/workflowBoundler_test.go
Additional comments not posted (3)
registry/runtimeRegistry.go (3)
6-6: LGTM: Import statement updated correctlyThe change from
"encoding/base64"to"encoding/base32"is consistent with the updated hash generation logic in theGetHashmethod. This modification ensures that the correct encoding package is imported for the new implementation.
60-64: LGTM: Well-designed IntrospectedExport interfaceThe new
IntrospectedExportinterface is well-designed and follows Go conventions. It provides a clear API for introspecting exports with methodsHasExport(),Value(), andValueAsMap(). This addition enhances the functionality of the package.
98-99: Please clarify the changes in the GetHash methodThe hash generation has been simplified to only use the
Sourcefield, and the encoding has been changed from base64 to base32. While these changes may be valid, they could have implications on the uniqueness and consistency of the generated hash.Could you please clarify the reasons for these changes? Additionally, consider adding a comment to explain the rationale behind using only the
Sourcefield and switching to base32 encoding.To verify the impact of these changes, please run the following script:
Verification successful
GetHash method changes verified successfully
The
GetHashmethod is only used in:
registry/runtimeRegistry.go: Definition ofGetHashmethod.gojaRuntime/gojaRuntime.go:workflowHash := workflow.GetHash()There are no additional usages or impacts found in the codebase.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for other usages of GetHash method and potential impacts # Test: Search for usages of GetHash method rg --type go '\bGetHash\b' # Test: Check for any comparisons or operations involving the hash rg --type go '\bGetHash\(\).*==' rg --type go '\bGetHash\(\).*!=' rg --type go '\bGetHash\(\).*compare'Length of output: 278
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Comprehensive search for all usages of GetHash method # Search for all usages of GetHash method rg --type go '\bGetHash\b' # Search for GetHash used as arguments in function calls rg --type go 'GetHash\(\)\s*,\s*' # Search for GetHash used in data structures (e.g., maps, slices) rg --type go 'GetHash\(\)\s*[:=]' # Search for GetHash in comments or documentation rg --type go '//.*GetHash' rg --type go '/\*.*GetHash.*\*/' # Search for variable assignments involving GetHash rg --type go '\b\w+\s*=\s*GetHash\(\)'Length of output: 345
registry/runtimeRegistry.go
Outdated
| InstrospectionOptions struct { | ||
| Exports []string | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approve new struct, but correct the spelling
The new InstrospectionOptions struct is a good addition for specifying which exports to introspect. However, there's a spelling error in the struct name.
Please correct the spelling as follows:
-InstrospectionOptions struct {
+IntrospectionOptions struct {
Exports []string
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| InstrospectionOptions struct { | |
| Exports []string | |
| } | |
| IntrospectionOptions struct { | |
| Exports []string | |
| } |
registry/runtimeRegistry.go
Outdated
| Execute(ctx context.Context, workflow WorkflowDescriptor, startOptions StartOptions) (ExecutionResult, error) | ||
| Introspect(ctx context.Context, workflow WorkflowDescriptor, options InstrospectionOptions) (IntrospectionResult, error) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Approve interface changes, but correct the spelling
The updates to the Runner interface are good improvements. The Execute method now correctly returns ExecutionResult, and the new Introspect method adds valuable functionality.
However, there's a spelling error in the Introspect method parameter. Please correct it as follows:
Runner interface {
Execute(ctx context.Context, workflow WorkflowDescriptor, startOptions StartOptions) (ExecutionResult, error)
- Introspect(ctx context.Context, workflow WorkflowDescriptor, options InstrospectionOptions) (IntrospectionResult, error)
+ Introspect(ctx context.Context, workflow WorkflowDescriptor, options IntrospectionOptions) (IntrospectionResult, error)
}Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| Execute(ctx context.Context, workflow WorkflowDescriptor, startOptions StartOptions) (ExecutionResult, error) | |
| Introspect(ctx context.Context, workflow WorkflowDescriptor, options InstrospectionOptions) (IntrospectionResult, error) | |
| Execute(ctx context.Context, workflow WorkflowDescriptor, startOptions StartOptions) (ExecutionResult, error) | |
| Introspect(ctx context.Context, workflow WorkflowDescriptor, options IntrospectionOptions) (IntrospectionResult, error) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
projectBundler/projectBundler_test.go (2)
11-11: Consider handling the ignored error fromfilepath.Abs().The error returned by
filepath.Abs()is currently ignored. It's a good practice to handle or at least check this error to ensure the path is valid.Consider modifying the line as follows:
-somePathInsideProject, _ := filepath.Abs("../testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows") +somePathInsideProject, err := filepath.Abs("../testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows") +if err != nil { + t.Fatalf("Failed to get absolute path: %v", err) +}
22-22: Consider using a constant for the version string.The version string "2024-12-09" is hardcoded in the test. It might be better to define this as a constant, especially if it's used in multiple places or might change in the future.
Consider adding a constant at the package level:
const expectedVersion = "2024-12-09"Then use it in the test:
-assert.Equal("2024-12-09", kindeProject.Configuration.Version) +assert.Equal(expectedVersion, kindeProject.Configuration.Version)projectBundler/projectBundler.go (2)
1-10: Consider renaming the package to follow Go naming conventions.The current package name
project_bundleruses an underscore, which is not idiomatic Go. Consider renaming it toprojectbundler(all lowercase, no underscore) to align with Go's standard naming conventions.-package project_bundler +package projectbundler
1-98: Summary of review for projectBundler.goOverall, this file introduces crucial functionality for project bundling. Here's a summary of the review:
- The package name should be changed to follow Go conventions.
- The struct definitions are well-structured and appropriate.
- The
ProjectBundlerinterface and implementation could be enhanced with context support and a more specific method name.- Error handling and validation in utility functions need improvement.
- The
NewProjectBundlerfunction is well-implemented.Addressing these points will significantly improve the robustness and maintainability of the code.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- projectBundler/projectBundler.go (1 hunks)
- projectBundler/projectBundler_test.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (5)
projectBundler/projectBundler_test.go (3)
1-8: LGTM: Package declaration and imports are correct.The package is correctly declared, and the necessary imports for testing and assertions are present.
11-24: LGTM: Test implementation is comprehensive.The test correctly initializes a
ProjectBundler, callsDiscover(), and makes appropriate assertions on the result. Good job on checking both for errors and specific configuration values.
10-10:⚠️ Potential issueFix typo in function name.
There's a typo in the function name: "Bunler" should be "Bundler".
Please apply the following change:
-func Test_ProjectBunler(t *testing.T) { +func Test_ProjectBundler(t *testing.T) {projectBundler/projectBundler.go (2)
12-46: LGTM: Well-structured type definitions.The struct definitions are clear, consistent, and use appropriate types. The JSON tags are correctly applied, which will be useful for serialization/deserialization.
82-86: LGTM: Well-implemented constructor function.The
NewProjectBundlerfunction is a clean and correct implementation of the factory pattern for creatingProjectBundlerinstances.
projectBundler/projectBundler.go
Outdated
| func discoverKindeRoot(startFolder string) (*ProjectConfiguration, error) { | ||
|
|
||
| currentDirectory, _ := filepath.Abs(startFolder) | ||
|
|
||
| fileInfo, _ := os.Stat(currentDirectory) | ||
| if !fileInfo.IsDir() { | ||
| currentDirectory = filepath.Dir(currentDirectory) | ||
| } | ||
| for { | ||
| filePath := filepath.Join(currentDirectory, "kinde.json") | ||
| configFile, _ := os.Stat(filePath) | ||
| if configFile != nil { | ||
| return readProjectConfiguration(filePath) | ||
| } | ||
| parentPath := filepath.Join(currentDirectory, "..") | ||
| currentDirectory, _ = filepath.Abs(parentPath) | ||
| if currentDirectory == "" { | ||
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("could not find kinde.json") | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func NewProjectBundler(discoveryOptions DiscoveryOptions) ProjectBundler { | ||
| return &projectBundler{ | ||
| options: discoveryOptions, | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func readProjectConfiguration(configFileInfo string) (*ProjectConfiguration, error) { | ||
| confiHandler, _ := os.Open(configFileInfo) | ||
| configFile, err := io.ReadAll(confiHandler) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("error reading project configuration: %w", err) | ||
| } | ||
| result := &ProjectConfiguration{} | ||
| json.Unmarshal(configFile, result) | ||
| result.AbsLocation = path.Dir(configFileInfo) | ||
| return result, nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Improve error handling and add validation in utility functions.
The discoverKindeRoot and readProjectConfiguration functions could benefit from improved error handling and validation:
-
In
discoverKindeRoot:- Handle errors from
os.Statcalls. - Consider using
filepath.Walkfor more efficient directory traversal.
- Handle errors from
-
In
readProjectConfiguration:- Handle the error from
os.Open. - Add validation for the parsed configuration.
- Handle the error from
Here's a suggested improvement for readProjectConfiguration:
func readProjectConfiguration(configFileInfo string) (*ProjectConfiguration, error) {
- confiHandler, _ := os.Open(configFileInfo)
+ configHandler, err := os.Open(configFileInfo)
+ if err != nil {
+ return nil, fmt.Errorf("error opening configuration file: %w", err)
+ }
+ defer configHandler.Close()
- configFile, err := io.ReadAll(confiHandler)
+ configFile, err := io.ReadAll(configHandler)
if err != nil {
return nil, fmt.Errorf("error reading project configuration: %w", err)
}
result := &ProjectConfiguration{}
- json.Unmarshal(configFile, result)
+ if err := json.Unmarshal(configFile, result); err != nil {
+ return nil, fmt.Errorf("error parsing project configuration: %w", err)
+ }
+
+ if err := validateProjectConfiguration(result); err != nil {
+ return nil, fmt.Errorf("invalid project configuration: %w", err)
+ }
+
result.AbsLocation = path.Dir(configFileInfo)
return result, nil
}
+func validateProjectConfiguration(config *ProjectConfiguration) error {
+ if config.Version == "" {
+ return fmt.Errorf("version is required")
+ }
+ if config.RootDir == "" {
+ return fmt.Errorf("rootDir is required")
+ }
+ return nil
+}These changes will make the code more robust and easier to debug.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
projectBundler/projectBundler.go
Outdated
| ProjectBundler interface { | ||
| Discover() (*KindeProject, error) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| projectBundler struct { | ||
| options DiscoveryOptions | ||
| } | ||
| ) | ||
|
|
||
| // Discover implements ProjectBundler. | ||
| func (p *projectBundler) Discover() (*KindeProject, error) { | ||
| result := &KindeProject{} | ||
| configuration, err := discoverKindeRoot(p.options.StartFolder) | ||
| if err != nil { | ||
| return nil, fmt.Errorf("error discoving project root: %w", err) | ||
| } | ||
| result.Configuration = *configuration | ||
| return result, nil | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider enhancing the ProjectBundler interface and implementation.
While the current implementation includes error handling, it could benefit from further improvements:
- The
Discover()method could be renamed toDiscoverProject()for clarity. - Consider adding context support for better cancellation and timeout handling.
Here's a suggested improvement:
type ProjectBundler interface {
- Discover() (*KindeProject, error)
+ DiscoverProject(ctx context.Context) (*KindeProject, error)
}
// DiscoverProject implements ProjectBundler.
-func (p *projectBundler) Discover() (*KindeProject, error) {
+func (p *projectBundler) DiscoverProject(ctx context.Context) (*KindeProject, error) {
result := &KindeProject{}
+
+ // Use a channel to handle cancellation
+ done := make(chan struct{})
+ var configuration *ProjectConfiguration
+ var err error
+
+ go func() {
+ configuration, err = discoverKindeRoot(p.options.StartFolder)
+ close(done)
+ }()
+
+ select {
+ case <-done:
+ if err != nil {
+ return nil, fmt.Errorf("error discovering project root: %w", err)
+ }
+ case <-ctx.Done():
+ return nil, ctx.Err()
+ }
- configuration, err := discoverKindeRoot(p.options.StartFolder)
- if err != nil {
- return nil, fmt.Errorf("error discoving project root: %w", err)
- }
result.Configuration = *configuration
return result, nil
}This change allows for more robust error handling and support for cancellation or timeouts via the context.
Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 19
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest2/authWorkflow.ts (1)
10-10: Consider using theeventparameter or remove it if unusedThe
handlefunction takes aneventparameter, but it's not used in the function body. Either utilize theeventparameter or remove it if it's not needed.projectBundler/projectBundler.go (2)
1-14: Consider renaming the package to follow Go naming conventions.The current package name
project_bundleruses an underscore, which is not idiomatic in Go. Consider renaming it toprojectbundlerto align with Go naming conventions.-package project_bundler +package projectbundler
1-157: Overall assessment: Good foundation with room for improvementThis file introduces important functionality for project bundling and provides a solid foundation. However, there are several areas where it could be improved:
- Error handling: Many methods could benefit from more robust error handling and propagation.
- Efficiency: Some methods, particularly
discoverKindeRoot, could be optimized for better performance.- Go best practices: The package name could be adjusted to follow Go naming conventions.
- Input validation: Adding validation for parsed configurations would improve robustness.
- Flexibility: The workflow file discovery process could be made more flexible.
Implementing the suggested improvements will enhance the reliability, efficiency, and maintainability of this code. Despite these areas for improvement, the overall structure and approach are sound.
workflowBundler/workflowBundler.go (1)
49-96: Consider handling build warningsWhile not critical, it might be beneficial to handle
tr.Warningsfrom the build process. Capturing warnings can help identify potential issues that are not severe enough to be classified as errors but may still affect the bundle's quality.tr := api.Build(opts) + // Optionally collect build warnings + if len(tr.Warnings) > 0 { + for _, warning := range tr.Warnings { + // Handle warnings as needed, e.g., log them or add to result + fmt.Printf("Build warning: %s\n", warning.Text) + } + }
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
- projectBundler/projectBundler.go (1 hunks)
- projectBundler/projectBundler_test.go (1 hunks)
- testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest/tokensWorkflow.ts (1 hunks)
- testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest2/authWorkflow.ts (1 hunks)
- workflowBundler/workflowBundler.go (1 hunks)
- workflowBundler/workflowBundler_test.go (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- projectBundler/projectBundler_test.go
🔇 Additional comments not posted (9)
testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest/tokensWorkflow.ts (4)
3-7: Workflow settings look good, please verify values.The
workflowSettingsobject is correctly structured. However, please confirm that:
- 'tokenGen' is the intended ID for this workflow.
- 'onTokenGeneration' is the correct trigger event.
- Setting
resetClaimstotrueis the desired behavior.
15-15: Review the return value.The function always returns the string 'testing return', regardless of the operations' outcomes. Consider if this is the intended behavior or if the return value should reflect the result of the workflow operations.
Please confirm if:
- The return value is used by the calling system.
- It should reflect the success or failure of the workflow operations.
- 'testing return' is just a placeholder that needs to be replaced with actual result data.
10-11: Verify the usage of the globalkindeobject.The code uses a
kindeobject that's not imported or defined in this file. Ensure that:
- The
kindeobject is globally available in the runtime environment.- The methods
setCustomClaimonidTokenandaccessTokenare part of the Kinde API.#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for Kinde SDK import or global declaration # Test 1: Look for Kinde SDK import in the project rg -t typescript "import.*from.*['\"]@kinde.*['\"]" # Test 2: Check for global Kinde object declaration rg -t typescript "declare.*global.*kinde"
1-1: Verify the importedhellofunction.The
hellofunction is imported from "./hello" and used later in the file. Please ensure that:
- The "./hello" file exists in the correct location.
- The
hellofunction is correctly exported from that file.- The function's implementation aligns with its intended use in this workflow.
testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest2/authWorkflow.ts (4)
16-16: Review the return valueThe function returns the string 'testing return', which appears to be a placeholder. Ensure this return value is appropriate for the workflow's purpose.
3-7: Verify naming convention andresetClaimsimplications
- The
idandtriggervalues end with '2'. Confirm if this is intentional and follows the project's naming convention.- The
resetClaimsproperty is set totrue. Ensure this is the intended behavior, as it may affect token generation by resetting all existing claims.To check for consistency in naming conventions, run:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for consistent naming conventions in workflow settings # Test: Search for other workflowSettings objects rg --type typescript "export const workflowSettings = \{" -A 5
11-12: Verify thekindeobject usage and importThe
kindeobject is used to set custom claims, but it's not imported or defined in this file. Ensure that thekindeobject is properly imported or made available globally.Run the following script to check for
kindeimport or definition:#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for kinde import or global definition # Test 1: Search for kinde import in this file rg --type typescript "import.*kinde" "testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest2/authWorkflow.ts" # Test 2: Search for global kinde definition in the project rg --type typescript "declare.*global.*\{.*kinde.*\}"
1-1: Verify the import and its usageThe
helloimport is used in a custom claim. Ensure that the "./hello" file exists and exports thehellofunction or variable as expected.Run the following script to check the import:
✅ Verification successful
Import and Usage Verified
The
helloimport is correctly defined, and the./hellofile exists with the expected export.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the hello.ts file and its export # Test 1: Check if hello.ts exists in the same directory fd -p "testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest2/hello.ts" # Test 2: Check if hello is exported from hello.ts rg -t typescript "export.*hello" "testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest2/hello.ts"Length of output: 322
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the hello.ts file and its export # Test 1: Check if hello.ts exists in the specified directory if [ -f "testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest2/hello.ts" ]; then echo "hello.ts exists." else echo "hello.ts does not exist." exit 1 fi # Test 2: Check if 'hello' is exported from hello.ts rg "export\s+.*hello\b" "testData/kindeSrc/environment/workflows/evTest2/hello.ts"Length of output: 225
projectBundler/projectBundler.go (1)
16-43: LGTM: Well-structured type definitions.The struct definitions are well-organized and appropriately tagged for JSON serialization. They provide a clear structure for representing project configuration, workflows, and discovery options.
| resetClaims: true | ||
| }; | ||
|
|
||
| export default async function handle (event: any) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider typing the event parameter.
The event parameter is typed as any. For better type safety and code clarity, consider defining a more specific type for the event object if its structure is known.
interface TokenGenerationEvent {
// Define known properties of the event object
}
export default async function handle(event: TokenGenerationEvent) {
// Function body
}| export default async function handle (event: any) { | ||
| kinde.idToken.setCustomClaim('random', 'test'); | ||
| kinde.accessToken.setCustomClaim('test2', {"test2": hello}); | ||
| console.log('logging from action', {"balh": "blah"}); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using structured logging.
Instead of using console.log directly, consider using a structured logging library or a custom logging function that can handle different log levels and formats consistently across the application.
import { logger } from './logger'; // Assume a logger utility exists
logger.info('logging from action', { balh: "blah" });| kinde.idToken.setCustomClaim('random', 'test'); | ||
| kinde.accessToken.setCustomClaim('test2', {"test2": hello}); | ||
| console.log('logging from action', {"balh": "blah"}); | ||
| await kinde.fetch("http://google.com"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review the necessity and security of the fetch request.
The function makes a fetch request to "http://google.com". Consider the following:
- Is this request necessary for the workflow, or is it a leftover from testing?
- If it's required, should it use HTTPS instead of HTTP?
- Error handling for the fetch request is missing.
If the request is not needed, remove it. If it is needed, consider updating it as follows:
try {
const response = await kinde.fetch("https://api.example.com/required-endpoint");
if (!response.ok) {
throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${response.status}`);
}
const data = await response.json();
// Process data as needed
} catch (error) {
console.error('Fetch request failed:', error);
// Handle the error appropriately
}| kinde.accessToken.setCustomClaim('test2', {"test2": hello}); | ||
| console.log('logging from action', {"balh": "blah"}); | ||
| await kinde.fetch("http://google.com"); | ||
| console.error('error log'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Reconsider error logging placement.
The console.error('error log') statement is not tied to any specific error condition. Consider removing it if it's not needed, or move it inside an appropriate error handling block.
If error logging is needed, consider wrapping the function body in a try-catch block:
try {
// Function operations
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error in handle function:', error);
// Handle the error appropriately
}| kinde.idToken.setCustomClaim('random', 'test'); | ||
| kinde.accessToken.setCustomClaim('test2', {"test2": hello}); | ||
| console.log('logging from action', {"balh": "blah"}); | ||
| await kinde.fetch("http://google.com"); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review the fetch URL and add error handling
The fetch request is made to "http://google.com", which might not be the intended URL. Additionally, there's no error handling for this request.
- Confirm if "http://google.com" is the correct URL for this request.
- Add error handling for the fetch request to manage potential network issues or errors.
Consider updating the code as follows:
try {
const response = await kinde.fetch("http://google.com");
if (!response.ok) {
throw new Error(`HTTP error! status: ${response.status}`);
}
// Process the response as needed
} catch (error) {
console.error('Fetch error:', error);
// Handle the error appropriately
}| builder struct { | ||
| bundleOptions BundlerOptions | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Confirm visibility of the builder struct
The WorkflowBundler interface is exported, but the builder struct implementing this interface is unexported. This is acceptable if the intention is to expose only the interface and hide the implementation details. Ensure this aligns with your design goals, and if external packages need to instantiate builder directly, consider exporting it.
| if len(tr.Errors) > 1 { | ||
| result.addError(errors.New("build produced multiple files, a single output is supported only")) | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Incorrect condition when checking for multiple output files
The condition if len(tr.Errors) > 1 is incorrect for determining if multiple output files were produced. You should check len(tr.OutputFiles) > 1 instead, as you want to ensure only a single output file is generated. The current condition may cause incorrect error handling.
Apply this diff to fix the condition:
- if len(tr.Errors) > 1 {
+ if len(tr.OutputFiles) > 1 {
result.addError(errors.New("build produced multiple files, a single output is supported only"))
}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| if len(tr.Errors) > 1 { | |
| result.addError(errors.New("build produced multiple files, a single output is supported only")) | |
| } | |
| if len(tr.OutputFiles) > 1 { | |
| result.addError(errors.New("build produced multiple files, a single output is supported only")) | |
| } |
| result := BundlerResult{} | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle build errors returned by esbuild
The build errors from tr.Errors are currently not being handled. Failing to handle these errors may result in unrecognized build failures and incomplete error reporting to the user.
Modify the code to collect and handle build errors:
result := BundlerResult{}
+ // Collect build errors from esbuild
+ for _, err := range tr.Errors {
+ result.addError(errors.New(err.Text))
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| result := BundlerResult{} | |
| result := BundlerResult{} | |
| // Collect build errors from esbuild | |
| for _, err := range tr.Errors { | |
| result.addError(errors.New(err.Text)) | |
| } |
| settings := introspectResult.GetExport("workflowSettings").ValueAsMap() | ||
|
|
||
| var workflowID string | ||
|
|
||
| if id, ok := settings["id"]; ok { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Check for nil before accessing introspection results
There's a potential nil pointer dereference when accessing introspectResult.GetExport("workflowSettings") without verifying that the export exists. Additionally, settings might be nil, so accessing settings["id"] without a nil check could cause a panic.
Add checks to prevent nil pointer dereferences:
- settings := introspectResult.GetExport("workflowSettings").ValueAsMap()
+ export := introspectResult.GetExport("workflowSettings")
+ if export == nil {
+ br.addError(errors.New("workflowSettings export not found"))
+ return WorkflowSettings{}
+ }
+ settings := export.ValueAsMap()
+ if settings == nil {
+ br.addError(errors.New("workflowSettings is not a valid map"))
+ return WorkflowSettings{}
+ }
var workflowID string
if id, ok := settings["id"]; ok {📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| settings := introspectResult.GetExport("workflowSettings").ValueAsMap() | |
| var workflowID string | |
| if id, ok := settings["id"]; ok { | |
| export := introspectResult.GetExport("workflowSettings") | |
| if export == nil { | |
| br.addError(errors.New("workflowSettings export not found")) | |
| return WorkflowSettings{} | |
| } | |
| settings := export.ValueAsMap() | |
| if settings == nil { | |
| br.addError(errors.New("workflowSettings is not a valid map")) | |
| return WorkflowSettings{} | |
| } | |
| var workflowID string | |
| if id, ok := settings["id"]; ok { |
| goja, _ := runtimesRegistry.ResolveRuntime("goja") | ||
| introspectResult, _ := goja.Introspect(context.Background(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Handle errors returned by ResolveRuntime and Introspect
Currently, errors returned by runtimesRegistry.ResolveRuntime("goja") and goja.Introspect are ignored. Ignoring errors can lead to nil pointer dereferences or unexpected behavior if the runtime cannot be resolved or introspection fails. It's important to handle these errors properly.
Modify the code to handle errors:
- goja, _ := runtimesRegistry.ResolveRuntime("goja")
+ goja, err := runtimesRegistry.ResolveRuntime("goja")
+ if err != nil {
+ br.addError(err)
+ return WorkflowSettings{}
+ }
- introspectResult, _ := goja.Introspect(context.Background(),
+ introspectResult, err := goja.Introspect(context.Background(),
runtimesRegistry.WorkflowDescriptor{
ProcessedSource: runtimesRegistry.CodeDescriptor{
Source: source,
SourceType: runtimesRegistry.Source_ContentType_Text,
},
Bindings: runtimesRegistry.Bindings{
GlobalModules: map[string]runtimesRegistry.ModuleBinding{
"console": {},
"url": {},
"module": {},
"kinde": {},
},
},
Limits: runtimesRegistry.RuntimeLimits{
MaxExecutionDuration: 30 * time.Second,
},
},
runtimesRegistry.IntrospectionOptions{
Exports: []string{"workflowSettings"},
})
+ if err != nil {
+ br.addError(err)
+ return WorkflowSettings{}
+ }📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| goja, _ := runtimesRegistry.ResolveRuntime("goja") | |
| introspectResult, _ := goja.Introspect(context.Background(), | |
| goja, err := runtimesRegistry.ResolveRuntime("goja") | |
| if err != nil { | |
| br.addError(err) | |
| return WorkflowSettings{} | |
| } | |
| introspectResult, err := goja.Introspect(context.Background(), | |
| runtimesRegistry.WorkflowDescriptor{ | |
| ProcessedSource: runtimesRegistry.CodeDescriptor{ | |
| Source: source, | |
| SourceType: runtimesRegistry.Source_ContentType_Text, | |
| }, | |
| Bindings: runtimesRegistry.Bindings{ | |
| GlobalModules: map[string]runtimesRegistry.ModuleBinding{ | |
| "console": {}, | |
| "url": {}, | |
| "module": {}, | |
| "kinde": {}, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| Limits: runtimesRegistry.RuntimeLimits{ | |
| MaxExecutionDuration: 30 * time.Second, | |
| }, | |
| }, | |
| runtimesRegistry.IntrospectionOptions{ | |
| Exports: []string{"workflowSettings"}, | |
| }) | |
| if err != nil { | |
| br.addError(err) | |
| return WorkflowSettings{} | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (1)
32-35: LGTM! Consider adding a fail_ci_if_error option.The "Upload results to Codecov" step looks good. It correctly uses the Codecov action and securely handles the token.
Consider adding the
fail_ci_if_erroroption to ensure the CI fails if there's an error uploading the coverage report:- name: Upload results to Codecov uses: codecov/codecov-action@v4 with: token: ${{ secrets.CODECOV_TOKEN }} + fail_ci_if_error: trueThis addition will help catch any issues with the coverage upload process early.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/ci.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
actionlint
.github/workflows/ci.yml
30-30: could not parse as YAML: yaml: line 30: mapping values are not allowed in this context
(syntax-check)
| - name: Run tests | ||
| run: go test -coverprofile=coverage.txt |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix YAML syntax for the "Run tests" step.
The current syntax for the "Run tests" step is incorrect. The run key should be at the same indentation level as the name key.
Please apply the following change to fix the YAML syntax:
- name: Run tests
- run: go test -coverprofile=coverage.txt
+ run: go test -coverprofile=coverage.txt📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - name: Run tests | |
| run: go test -coverprofile=coverage.txt | |
| - name: Run tests | |
| run: go test -coverprofile=coverage.txt |
🧰 Tools
actionlint
30-30: could not parse as YAML: yaml: line 30: mapping values are not allowed in this context
(syntax-check)
Explain your changes
Suppose there is a related issue with enough detail for a reviewer to understand your changes fully. In that case, you can omit an explanation and instead include either “Fixes #XX” or “Updates #XX” where “XX” is the issue number.
Checklist
🛟 If you need help, consider asking for advice over in the Kinde community.