You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I confirm that I am using English to submit this report (我已阅读并同意 Language Policy).
[FOR CHINESE USERS] 请务必使用英文提交 Issue,否则会被关闭。谢谢!:)
Please do not modify this template :) and fill in all the required fields.
1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.
Many times it is necessary for the user to manually copy and paste the output of a workflow using the result box.
That is inadequate because: 1) it is inefficient and goes against the automation philosophy of the project, 2) manually extracting the output of a workflow is cumbersome and prone to errors, 3) the lack of a remote save option prevents the use of temp files in the workflow essentials for debug, 4) it prevents the option to auto-resume/retry a workflow without having to restart it from scratch and lose the progress, 5) it makes impossible to update files remotely and asynchronously using the workflow as a chron/timed automatic job that does not require user intervention.
The proposal id to add a “Save to...” block, with the function to save the output files on SFTP or Clouds remote services like:
SFTP/SSH remote server (with automatic SSH key generation)
Google Drive
Microsoft One Drive
DropBox
Microsoft Azure
AWS S3
WebDAV
Jottacloud (for European users)
Tailscale (for sensible data)
Yandex Drive
GitHub (and with GitHub Action to update files based on a cron custom script)
It would be great if the user could add more than one service as a fallback in case one was temporarily unavailable.
2. Additional context or comments
Of course, a correspondent “Load from...” block would be also useful, since it would share the remotes configurations and would not require additional actions by the user.
3. Can you help us with this feature?
I am interested in contributing to this feature.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Self Checks
1. Is this request related to a challenge you're experiencing? Tell me about your story.
Many times it is necessary for the user to manually copy and paste the output of a workflow using the result box.
That is inadequate because: 1) it is inefficient and goes against the automation philosophy of the project, 2) manually extracting the output of a workflow is cumbersome and prone to errors, 3) the lack of a remote save option prevents the use of temp files in the workflow essentials for debug, 4) it prevents the option to auto-resume/retry a workflow without having to restart it from scratch and lose the progress, 5) it makes impossible to update files remotely and asynchronously using the workflow as a chron/timed automatic job that does not require user intervention.
The proposal id to add a “Save to...” block, with the function to save the output files on SFTP or Clouds remote services like:
It would be great if the user could add more than one service as a fallback in case one was temporarily unavailable.
2. Additional context or comments
Of course, a correspondent “Load from...” block would be also useful, since it would share the remotes configurations and would not require additional actions by the user.
3. Can you help us with this feature?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: