You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Description
A recent paper presented high-quality implantation distributions and reflection coefficients (in the form of deposition rates, that is, D = 1 - R) for D on Be. At low energies, they show significantly higher reflection coefficients than SRIM, which is to be expected for a reactive ion-target pair.
Finding an appropriate D-Be potential would make this a very good benchmark for RustBCA's attractive-repulsive potential capabilities. They used a 3-body potential which the BCA cannot replicate; however, at the relevant ion energies (100s of eV) I suspect most of the physics can be adequately modeled with an attractive-repulsive pair potential instead.
Description
A recent paper presented high-quality implantation distributions and reflection coefficients (in the form of deposition rates, that is, D = 1 - R) for D on Be. At low energies, they show significantly higher reflection coefficients than SRIM, which is to be expected for a reactive ion-target pair.
Finding an appropriate D-Be potential would make this a very good benchmark for RustBCA's attractive-repulsive potential capabilities. They used a 3-body potential which the BCA cannot replicate; however, at the relevant ion energies (100s of eV) I suspect most of the physics can be adequately modeled with an attractive-repulsive pair potential instead.
Source
Investigations into penetration depth profiles of hydrogenic species in beryllium plasma-facing components via molecular dynamics simulations, Liptak et al. (2024)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: