You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
About the iso testing4: It's my own ignorance which drives me to the question: should there be a warning about XFS if you are planning to use XFS as a root filesystem? Grub can simply not boot this.
Or should I have known this? :-)
Regards,
Marco
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It's a fair question to ask. Lunar have never been a distribution that holds your hand along the way, it does expect that you do know a few things. But in this case I actually believe we could throw in a warning if you try to install on / or /boot without a supported filesystem by the boot loader of choice.
👎
We do have a lot of problems in lunar, but in my opinion this is none of them.
If you try to use xfs as /, you will learn that this is not a good idea.
If someone has spare time to work on that, the work would be much better spent with one of the issues in https://github.com/lunar-linux/lunar
(This of course doesn't mean that useful merge requests will be ignored if you decided to spend time on this issue)
By adding EFI we add even more issues regarding choice of fs and partition type. Either way we need to add a few checks, they should be trivial to add. But I fully support working on the issues in our core tools as well, any of our developer can take an issue and hack away actually :)
About the iso testing4: It's my own ignorance which drives me to the question: should there be a warning about XFS if you are planning to use XFS as a root filesystem? Grub can simply not boot this.
Or should I have known this? :-)
Regards,
Marco
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: