-
Some time ago, it was possible to input separate pajek files each as individual layers in a multilayer network: This seems to not be possible anymore? This will mean that I will need to specify a multilayer network locally, which is of course doable. I guess that making a multilayer network without interlayer connections would be the same, or am I missing something? If so, what? Also, I will join the (small) quire of people who lament the loss of --overlapping. I was/am aware of the assumptions of that particular method, but the results the times I used it were actually meaningful. So perhaps the model could be reintroduced? As well as the awesome multi-network-input option :) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
-
Correct, you want to use the multilayer format with only intralayer links. Example from https://www.mapequation.org/infomap/#InputMultilayer
We are working on something better and more principled than the --overlapping option. Meanwhile, would you be interested in a script that reads a standard network and outputs a second-order network (with first-order information) in state format https://www.mapequation.org/infomap/#InputStates ? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Correct, you want to use the multilayer format with only intralayer links. Example from https://www.mapequation.org/infomap/#InputMultilayer
We are working on something better and more principled than the --overlapping option. Meanwhile, would you be interested in a script that reads a standard network and outputs a second-order network (with first-order information) in state format https://www.mapequation.org/infomap/#InputStates